One journal. Two disciplines. Shared excellence.

Dental and Medical Problems

Title abbreviation: Dent Med Probl
Journal Impact Factor (JIF 2025) – 4.3
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI 2025) - 1.38
Scopus CiteScore (2025) – 5.8
Index Copernicus Value (ICV 2024) – 178.25
MNiSW – 70 pts
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – bimonthly


 

Download original text (EN)

Dental and Medical Problems

2026, vol. 63, nr 3, May-June, p. 771–778

doi: 10.17219/dmp/193891

Publication type: review

Language: English

License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Cite as:


Krishnamoorthy G, Narayana A, Balkrishanan D. Classification of post-and-core assembly failures: An extensive compilation of 33 years of data. Dent Med Probl. 2026;63(3):771–778. doi:10.17219/dmp/193891

Classification of post-and-core assembly failures: An extensive compilation of 33 years of data

Gayathri Krishnamoorthy1,A,B,C,D, Aparna Narayana1,A,E,F, Dhanasekar Balkrishanan1,E,F

1 Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India

Abstract

Over the past 2 decades, a wide range of post-and-core materials has been developed to restore endodontically treated teeth (ETT) with extensive loss of coronal tooth structure. Although the prognosis and long-term success of ETT are influenced by multiple factors, most research has focused on post-and-core materials, the ferrule effect and luting agents. However, a classification of failures associated with post-and-core assemblies is currently lacking. This study aimed to identify and classify post-and-core assembly failures.
A literature search was conducted using the terms “post and core” and “dental post and core” in the title and abstract. Articles published in English between 1991 and 2024 were retrieved from the PubMed®, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases. Of the 491 articles identified, 23 met the inclusion criteria and were used to develop the proposed classification.
Based on the available evidence, post-and-core assembly failures can be classified into 2 categories: catastrophic and non-catastrophic failures. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first comprehensive classification of post-and-core assembly failures derived from evidence spanning 33 years of published literature. The proposed classification provides a standardized framework for identifying and reporting failures and may facilitate clinical decision-making, laboratory communication and future research.

Key words

luting agents, ferrule, endodontically treated teeth, post-and-core failures, dental posts

Graphical abstract


Graphical abstracts

Highlights


  • This article introduces the first comprehensive classification system for post and-core assembly failures based on 33 years of published literature.
  • The classification categorizes post-and-core assembly failures as catastrophic or non-catastrophic, providing a standardized framework for diagnosis, reporting and clinical decision-making.
  • The classification supports consistent communication among clinicians, researchers and educators involved in post-and-core treatment.

References (46)

  1. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: A review. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(4):355–363. PMID:11508092.
  2. Naumann M, Kiessling S, Seemann R. Treatment concepts for restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A nationwide survey of dentists in Germany. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96(5):332–338. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.028
  3. Ferrari M, Pontoriero DIK, Ferrari Cagidiaco E, Carboncini F. Restorative difficulty evaluation system of endodontically treated teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(1):65–80. doi:10.1111/jerd.12880
  4. Trope M, Malts DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1985;1(3):108–111. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.1985.tb00571.x
  5. Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review of the literature, Part II (Evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int. 2008;39(2):117–129. PMID:18560650.
  6. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71(6):565–567. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(94)90438-3
  7. Marchionatti AME, Wandscher VF, Rippe MP, Kaizer OB, Valandro LF. Clinical performance and failure modes of pulpless teeth restored with posts: A systematic review. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31:e64. doi:10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0064
  8. Naumann M, Preuss A, Frankenberger R. Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts. Dent Mater. 2007;23(2):138–144. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.002
  9. Salameh Z, Sorrentino R, Ounsi HF, Sadig W, Atiyeh F, Ferrari M. The effect of different full-coverage crown systems on fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with and without glass fiber posts. J Endod. 2008;34(7):842–846. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.025
  10. Guldener KA, Lanzrein CL, Siegrist Guldener BE, Lang NP, Ramseier CA, Salvi GE. Long-term clinical outcomes of endodontically treated teeth restored with or without fiber post-retained single unit restorations. J Endod. 2017;43(2):188–193. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.008
  11. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Fadda GM, et al. A randomized controlled trial of endodontically treated and restored premolars. J Dent Res. 2012;91(7 Suppl):72S–78S. doi:10.1177/0022034512447949
  12. Salvi GE, Siegrist Guldener BE, Amstad T, Joss A, Lang NP. Clinical evaluation of root filled teeth restored with or without post-and-core systems in a specialist practice setting. Int Endod J. 2007;40(3):209–215. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01218.x
  13. Salameh Z, Sorrentino R, Papacchini F, et al. Fracture resistance and failure patterns of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored using resin composite with or without translucent glass fiber posts. J Endod. 2006;32(8):752–755. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2006.02.002
  14. Sorrentino R, Monticelli F, Goracci C, et al. Effect of post-retained composite restorations and amount of coronal residual structure on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth. Am J Dent. 2007;20(4):269–274. PMID:17907493.
  15. Zicari F, van Meerbeek B, Scotti R, Naert I. Effect of ferrule and post placement on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after fatigue loading. J Dent. 2013;41(3):207–215. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2012.10.004
  16. Magne P, Lazari PC, Carvalho MA, Johnson T, Del Bel Cury AA. Ferrule-effect dominates over use of a fiber post when restoring endodontically treated incisors: An in vitro study. Oper Dent. 2017;42(4):396–406. doi:10.2341/16-243-L
  17. Bitter K, Noetzel J, Stamm O, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic restorations: Preliminary results of a mean period of 32 months. J Endod. 2009;35(11):1477–1482. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.026
  18. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: A study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51(6):780–784. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(84)90376-7
  19. Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69(1):36–40. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(93)90237-i
  20. Torbjörner A, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73(5):439–444. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80072-1
  21. Akkayan B, Caniklioglu B. Resistance to fracture of crowned teeth restored with different post systems. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1998;6(1):13–18. PMID:9680880.
  22. Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent. 2000;13(Spec No):15B–18B. PMID:11763866.
  23. Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: An in-vitro study. J Dent. 2001;29(6):427–433. doi:10.1016/s0300-5712(01)00038-0
  24. Hu YH, Pang LC, Hsu CC, Lau YH. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with four post-and-core systems. Quintessence Int. 2003;34(5):349–353. PMID:12795353.
  25. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Le Bell-Rönnlöf AM, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK, Creugers NHJ. In vitro fracture behavior of maxillary premolars with metal crowns and several post-and-core systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006;114(3):250–256. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00357.x
  26. Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A, Asmussen E. A survey of failed post-retained restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12(1):37–44. doi:10.1007/s00784-007-0137-9
  27. Al-Wahadni AM, Hamdan S, Al-Omiri M, Hammad MM, Hatamleh MM. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems: In vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106(2):e77–e83. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.038
  28. Gómez-Polo M, Llidó B, Rivero A, Del Río J, Celemín A. A 10-year retrospective study of the survival rate of teeth restored with metal prefabricated posts versus cast metal posts and cores. J Dent. 2010;38(11):916–920. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2010.08.006
  29. Schmitter M, Hamadi K, Rammelsberg P. Survival of two post systems – five-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Quintessence Int. 2011;42(10):843–850. PMID:22025998.
  30. Zicari F, Van Meerbeek B, Debels E, Lesaffre E, Naert I. An up to 3-year controlled clinical trial comparing the outcome of glass fiber posts and composite cores with gold alloy-based posts and cores for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24(4):363–372. PMID:21716975.
  31. Balkenhol M, Rupf S, Laufersweiler I, Huber K, Hannig M. Failure analysis and survival rate of post and core restorations under cyclic loading. Int Endod J. 2011;44(10):926–937. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01901.x
  32. Sterzenbach G, Franke A, Naumann M. Rigid versus flexible dentine-like endodontic posts--clinical testing of a biomechanical concept: Seven-year results of a randomized controlled clinical pilot trial on endodontically treated abutment teeth with severe hard tissue loss. J Endod. 2012;38(12):1557–1563. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.08.015
  33. Hegde J, Ramakrishna, Bashetty K, Srirekha, Lekha, Champa. An in vitro evaluation of fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with simulated flared root canals restored with different post and core systems. J Conserv Dent. 2012;15(3):223–227. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.97942
  34. Gbadebo OS, Ajayi DM, Oyekunle OOD, Shaba PO. Randomized clinical study comparing metallic and glass fiber post in restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Indian J Dent Res. 2014;25(1):58–63. doi:10.4103/0970-9290.131126
  35. Sarkis-Onofre R, Jacinto RC, Boscato N, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Cast metal vs. glass fibre posts: A randomized controlled trial with up to 3 years of follow up. J Dent. 2014;42(5):582–587. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.003
  36. Cloet E, Debels E, Naert I. Controlled clinical trial on the outcome of glass fiber composite cores versus wrought posts and cast cores for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A 5-year follow-up study. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30(1):71–79. doi:10.11607/ijp.4861
  37. Casanova TP, Özcan M. Can fiber-reinforced resin composites alone substitute adhesively luted intraradicular post and core materials under static and dynamic loading? J Adhes Sci Technol. 2021;35(19):2064–2078. doi:10.1080/01694243.2021.1872194
  38. Nodehi D, Moraditalab A, Shafiee S, Sekandari S, Ahrari F. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars reconstructed by traditional casting and CAD–CAM milling post and cores. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:6736303. doi:10.1155/2022/6736303
  39. Zhu Z, Dong XY, He S, Pan X, Tang L. Effect of post placement on the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28(5):475–483. doi:10.11607/ijp.4120
  40. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A literature review. J Endod. 2004;30(5):289–301. doi:10.1097/00004770-200405000-00001
  41. Tang W, Wu Y, Smales RJ. Identifying and reducing risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 2010;36(4):609–617. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.002
  42. Fuss Z, Lustig J, Katz A, Tamse A. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertical root fractured teeth: Impact of operative procedures. J Endod. 2001;27(1):46–48. doi:10.1097/00004770-200101000-00017
  43. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NHJ. Composite resin core-crown reconstructions: An up to 17-year follow-up of a controlled clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21(2):109–115. PMID:18546762.
  44. Mannocci F, Qualtrough AJ, Worthington HV, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR. Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: Five-year results. Oper Dent. 2005;30(1):9–15. PMID:15765952.
  45. Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherriff M, Watson TF, Ford TRP. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88(3):297–301. doi:10.1067/mpr.2002.128492
  46. Mazzoni A, Marchesi G, Cadenaro M, et al. Push-out stress for fibre posts luted using different adhesive strategies. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117(4):447–453. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00656.x
© Wroclaw Medical University