Dental and Medical Problems

Dent Med Probl
Impact Factor (IF 2024) – 3.9
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI 2024) - 1.36
Scopus CiteScore (2024) – 5.0
Index Copernicus Value (ICV 2023) – 181.00
MNiSW – 70 pts
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – bimonthly


 

Download original text (EN)

Dental and Medical Problems

2025, vol. 62, nr 5, September-October, p. 883–889

doi: 10.17219/dmp/169141

Publication type: original article

Language: English

License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Cite as:


Devarajan LA, Ramamurthy S, Yadalam P, et al. Potential inhibition of Porphyromonas gingivalis Lys-gingipain by 4-caffeoylquinic acid of Moringa oleifera extract: In silico docking and dynamic simulation. Dent Med Probl. 2025;62(5):883–889. doi:10.17219/dmp/169141

Potential inhibition of Porphyromonas gingivalis Lys-gingipain by 4-caffeoylquinic acid of Moringa oleifera extract: In silico docking and dynamic simulation

Lekha Alanija Devarajan1,B,D,E, Shanmugapriya Ramamurthy1,A,D,F, Pradeep Yadalam2,A, Arunmozhi Ulaganathan1,E, Raaja Sreepathy Chandran Selvaraj1,B,C, Reshma Rajendran1,C, Meenakshi Adhappan1,E

1 Department of Periodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India

2 Department of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, India

Graphical abstract


Graphical abstracts

Highlights


  • Porphyromonas gingivalis, a keystone pathogen in chronic periodontitis, expresses Lys-gingipain protease, which contributes to host tissue destruction and dysbiosis.
  • 4-Caffeoylquinic acid (4-CQA), a phenolic compound derived from Moringa oleifera, demonstrated strong binding affinity (−6.6 kcal/mol) to Lys-gingipain via multiple hydrogen and π–π interactions in molecular docking.
  • Molecular dynamics simulation confirmed the stability of the 4-CQA–Lys gingipain complex up to 100 ns, supporting its inhibitory potential.
  • 4-CQA may function as a natural gingipain inhibitor, offering a promising adjunctive or preventive approach for the management of periodontitis.
  • Further in vitro and in vivo studies are needed to confirm the bioactivity and translational potential of M. oleifera-derived phytocompounds in periodontal therapy.

Abstract

Background. Periodontitis is an inflammatory disease of the oral cavity that affects the soft and hard tissues of the periodontium due to dysbiosis by Porphyromonas gingivalis. The bacterium establishes its pathogenicity through its virulence factors, such as fimbriae, and by the releasing proteases like gingipains. The lysine-specific gingipain K (Kgp) is characterized by the presence of a hemagglutinin (HA)–adhesin domain, which provides the micronutrients for the survival of the microbe. 4-Caffeoylquinic acid (4-CQA) is classified as a phenylpropanoid. It exhibits a variety of bioactivities, including anti-inflammatory, anti­microbial, antihistaminic, and antioxidant properties. Moringa oleifera has multiple therapeutic benefits and is used in the treatment of cancer, infections, diabetes, and arthritis. 4-Caffeoylquinic acid was identified among the phenolic phytocomponents present in M. oleifera.

Objectives. The aim of the present study was to use in silico docking and a dynamic model to evaluate the potential inhibition of Lys-gingipain of P. gingivalis by 4-CQA of M. oleifera.

Material and methods. Molecular docking and dynamic simulations of the Lys-gingipain protein and 4-CQA ligands were performed using the Desmond software. The protein structure of Lys-gingipain was downloaded from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and preprocessed using the optimized potentials for liquid simulations (OPLS 2005) force field.

Results. During the course of the dynamic simulation, the trajectories were saved for the analysis every 100 ns. The stability of the complex was confirmed by a root mean square deviation (RMSD) plot. In the context of molecular docking, the protein (Lys-gingipain) and the ligand (4-CQA) were found to have a potential binding site with the use of hydrogen bonds. The compound had a docking score of −6.6 kcal/mol. According to the results of the dynamic study, as depicted in the RMSD plot, the compound demonstrated stability within the range of 1.0–3.0 Å.

Conclusions. The inhibition of Lys-gingipain by 4-CQA is a promising avenue for further investigation, whether in vitro or in vivo.

Keywords: Moringa oleifera, chronic periodontitis, molecular docking, gingipains, Porphyromonas gingivalis

Introduction

Periodontitis is a common oral condition prevalent in individuals with poor oral hygiene and affecting both the hard and soft supporting structures of the teeth. Additional factors that could influence the course of the disease include various systemic conditions, stress, malocclusion, orthodontic therapy, ill-fitting dentures, and genetics.1 Population-based studies have concluded that untreated periodontitis results in compromised quality of life due to functional, aesthetic and social disabilities.2 Periodontitis is caused by dysbiosis of oral microbial flora colonizing the supra- and subgingival regions of the teeth.3 Regarding the polymicrobial etiology, the complex red organisms are commonly associated with periodonti­tis, including Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola and Tannerella forsythia.3, 4 Of P. gingivalis, a Gram-negative anaerobic rod exhibits a more significant effect on the oral microbiome and disrupts host–microbe hemostasis.5 As P. gingivalis initiates the dysbiosis of oral flora, it is called the keystone pathogen. It establishes and propagates periodontal disease through a virulence factor called gingipain. Gingipains are a group of cysteine proteases that are found in the outer membrane or the vesicles of the bacteria.6 They play a crucial part in maintaining the pathogenic functions of the bacterium in the host. Gingipains aid in colonization and adherence of the pathogen to epithelial cells, as well as cause the breakdown of erythrocytes, resulting in hemolysis. The generated heme provides an additional nutritional source for further multiplication and colonization of the bacteria. Subsequently, P. gingivalis modulates the host inflammatory response, leading to further progression and tissue destruction.7

Based on its amino acid composition, a gingipain can be classified as8:

• arginine-specific gingipain A (RgpA);

• arginine-specific gingipain B (RgpB);

• lysine-specific gingipain K (Kgp).

Lysine-specific gingipain K has a maximum of 3–5 hemagglutinin (HA)/adhesin domains in its genomic protein. In contrast, there are only 4 HA/adhesin domains in RgpA and no such domains in RgpB. As the number of domains increases, there is a concomitant increase in the effectiveness of host cell adhesion and heme acquisition.9 The distribution of domains in Kgp is a critical virulent factor of P. gingivalis.8 The analysis of the pathogens involved in the development of this pathology is a recurrent theme in the literature, which underscores its importance as a public health problem. Precisely for this purpose, the ability to identify targeted treatments against selected bacterial species is of current and future interest.10

Scientific evidence has suggested that since P. gingivalis is the keystone pathogen of periodontitis, treatment strategies directed towards it may prevent disharmony of the oral microbiome and inhibit disease progression. There are several treatment modalities for periodontitis, including non-surgical therapy involving scaling and root planning with or without antimicrobial therapy to decrease the microbial load, host modulation therapy, and surgical therapy for repairing or regenerating the lost periodontium.11 Advanced treatment strategies that could inhibit gingipain functions may have an indirect biological effect on P. gingivalis. They could suppress the availability of micronutrients for the growth of the bacterium and make it vulnerable to the defensive actions of immune cells. Apart from chemotherapeutic agents, natural remedies such as tulsi, aloe vera, neem, propolis, tea tree oil,12 and tropical fruits like mangosteen13 have been studied for their anti-microbial effect in the non-surgical treatment of periodontitis. The extensive research on herbal remedies is attributable to their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, along with a reduced incidence of side effects.14

Moringa oleifera, also known as the miracle tree, is one of the most commonly cultivated trees in tropical and subtropical regions. It is a rich source of phytonutrients, vitamins, minerals, and essential amino acids. Moringa oleifera also provides a rare combination of zeatin, quercetin, sitosterol, caffeoylquinic acid, and kaempferol.15 Various in vitro studies have concluded that many parts of Moleifera, like leaves, pods, barks, nuts, flowers, and tubers, possess significant health benefits.16 4-Caffeoylquinic acid (4-CQA) is a phenylpropanoid of M. oleifera, the bioactivities of which include antioxidant, antibacterial, antidiabetic, anticancer, and antihistaminic effects.17 The antibacterial activity of phenolic compounds has been attributed to the loss of cellular integrity, leading to increased membrane permeability, subsequent disturbance of the cellular membrane, and ultimately, cell death.18

Molecular docking is a computer-assisted tool that is used to identify the complete binding site between the target protein and the drug in a three-dimensional assembly.19 This identification is a preliminary step in drug design that is performed before conducting in vitro and in vivo research. Hence, the present study aimed to assess the potential inhibition of P. gingivalis Lys-gingipain by 4-CQA of M. oleifera by means of in silico docking and dynamic simulations.

Material and methods

Molecular docking and dynamic simulations of the Lys-gingipain protein and 4-CQA ligands20 were performed using the Desmond software (Schrödinger, New York, USA).

The 3D protein structure of Lys-gingipain was down­loaded from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) database (https://www.rcsb.org/structure/3M1H). The protein structure was processed using the Maestro platform (https://www.schrodinger.com/platform/products/maestro; Schrödinger). The Protein Preparation Wizard (Maestro; Schrödinger) was used to preprocess the receptorligand complex. In general, water molecules present in the protein can be easily displaced by the ligand or be a hindrance to the binding pocket. Therefore, the pre­processing steps in the protein preparation removed all heteroatoms and loosely bound water molecules by the addition of hydrogen ions. The selected protein structure was then examined for gaps and built further to fill the loops. After optimization, it was minimized using the optimized potentials for liquid simulations (OPLS 2005) force field. Conformers for each compound were obtained using force field estimates by the OPLS 2005 between atoms within and between the molecules.

The ligand was prepared after downloading the chemical structure of 4-CQA from the PubChem database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/#query=9798666). Then, the ligand was subjected to energy minimization using the OPLS 2005 force field to achieve correct bond length, order and angle with minimal energy. This grid-based ligand docking method was used to evaluate the interaction between the protein and the ligand. A grid box was utilized to describe the protein’s binding site with the following dimensions: center X – 9.599; center Y – 3.6929; center Z – 29.3808; size of X – 50.2525510788; size of Y – 33.8531600094; and size of Z – 34.8833085537.

Molecular dynamic simulations

The System Builder tool was used in the preparation of each system. The tool is designed to simulate the protein and the ligand. The default solvent water model TIP3P (3 points of transferable intermolecular interaction potential) with an orthorhombic box was selected to perform the dynamic simulation. Since there is a water-mediated interaction between the protein and the ligand in this TIP3 model, water must be included during the docking calculation. The OPLS 2005 force field was utilized in the simulation to generate the essential topology records.

The addition of counterions served to neutralize the models. To simulate the physiological condition, 0.15 M of sodium chloride (NaCl) was added. The isothermal–isobaric (NPT) ensemble was used, maintaining a temperature of 300 K and 1-Atm pressure throughout the simulation. The models were loosened before the simulation. Every 100 ns, the trajectories were saved for the analysis. The stability of the simulation was confirmed by contrasting the root mean square deviation (RMSD) of the protein and ligand over time.

Results

The three-dimensional docking model of the ligand–protein complex and the protein–ligand complex of Lys-gingipain and 4-CQA are depicted in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively.

The interaction between the binding site residues of Lys-gingipain protein and the 4-CQA ligand are depicted two-dimensionally in Figure 3 and three-dimensionally in Figure 4.

The docking scores or binding affinities provide an estimation of the strength of the interaction between the ligand and the receptor. Lower scores or more negative binding energies generally indicate stronger binding. However, it is essential to validate these outcomes with experimental data or alternative methods to assess their reliability. Docking studies are a method of predicting the binding mode of a ligand within a receptor’s active site. An examination of the specific interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic contacts and electrostatic interactions, can help understand the key molecular interactions responsible for ligand binding. In the pres­ent study, the compound demonstrated a docking score of −6.6 kcal/mol, therefore substantiating strong binding between the ligand and the protein.

These results indicate that the 4-CQA ligand demonstrates the most favorable affinity for binding with the Lys-gingipain protein by forming strong hydrogen bond interactions with amino acids such as ALA 1440, PRO 1439, TRP 1442, and GLY 1451. The compound also forms a π–π interaction with ILE 1438.

Figure 5 presents the RMSD of the ligand molecule docked on the protein. According to the complex protein–ligand RMSD plot, the complex reached stability at 60 ns. Following this, the RMSD values for the protein remained within the 1.0–2.0 Å range throughout the simulation, while the ligand RMSD fluctuated within the 1.0–3.0 Å range. The RMSD figure demonstrated that the proteins within the complex reached stability at 60 ns. Following that, fluctuations in the RMSD values for the protein remained within the 1.0–2.0 Å range throughout the simulation. In contrast, the ligand RMSD values varied more widely, within the 8.0–36.0 Å range up to 100 ns, indicating higher conformational flexibility of the ligand within the binding pocket.

Table 1 presents the hydrophobic interactions between the amino acid residues of the protein and the ligand. Table 2 shows the hydrogen bonds formed between the amino acid residues of the protein and the ligand. These parameters include the interaction distances and the donor angles that characterize the bonding between the protein and the ligand.

Discussion

Periodontitis is caused by microbial pathogens present in biofilm complexes.21 These pathogens have a strong affinity to enter the bloodstream and rupture atherosclerotic plaque, causing fatality like stroke.22 Among the patho­gens, P. gingivalis in the red complex group significantly contributes to chronic periodontitis.23 Though there are many periopathogens, P. gingivalis is the one that is commonly isolated from subgingival plaque samples.24 It has various virulence factors like fimbriae, capsules, vesicles, and proteases in the outer membrane.25, 26, 27 The virulence factors help colonize and multiply the bacteria by evading the host defense mechanism. Notably, heme is required for the growth of P. gingivalis, which, in turn, is acquired by the bacteria itself through the process of hemolysis of the host erythrocytes. The process of hemolysis is facilitated by the gingipain protease of P. gingivalis.28 Gingipains are a group of cysteine proteinases that are commonly found in the outer membrane of bacteria. Apart from degrading the proteins for their nutrition, they also compromise the host immune response and cause destruction of the periodontal soft and hard tissues.26 A periodontal treatment that targets the HA domain of gingipain has the potential to inhibit the colonization of P. gingivalis on the root surface.29 Cysteine peptidases, such as Kgp, RgpA and RgpB, which account for 85% of the pathogen’s extracellular proteolytic activity, are good candidates for inactivation. FA-70C1 is a strong P. gingivalis gingipain inhibitor derived from Streptomyces FA-70 culture supernatant.30 Previous research has reported the high-resolution (1.20) complex structure of Kgp with KYT-36, a peptide-derived, effective, bioavailable, and highly selective inhibitor.31

Phytocomponents are a rich source of protease inhibi­tors. In this regard, the extract of rice grain of Oryza sativa exhibited a significant gingipain inhibitory effect on Kgp and Rgps.30 These rice proteins were denoted as 16 unassigned peptidase inhibitor homologues in the database.30 Canavanine present in sword bean (Canavalia gladiata), when administered orally, decreased the alveolar bone loss in P. gingivalis-induced periodontitis in rats.32 Polyphenols present in cranberry significantly reduced biofilm formation by P. gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum. Catechin, a polyphenol present in green tea, reduced the inflammatory reaction through its inhibitory effect on Rgp gingipain.33 Moringa oleifera contains phyto­compounds, including flavonoids and phenolic acids. Phenolic acids are secondary plant metabolites that contain one or more hydroxyl groups connected to aromatic rings and act as scavengers.34 Among the phenolic compounds present in M. oleifera, CQA is also isolated from extracts of M. oleifera.35 Caffeoylquinic acid has shown antioxidant, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties.36

Caffeoylquinic acid is otherwise called chlorogenic acid (CA).37 A study was conducted to assess the effect of coffee on periodontitis, given the presence of caffeine and CA in the beverage.38 The study concluded that CA demonstrated significant anti-inflammatory activity because it inhibited nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and resulted in substantial radical oxygen scavenging. The anti-inflammatory effect of CQA is enhanced in the presence of other phytocomponents, such as flavonoids.38

In another study, the antibacterial effect of CA was tested against P. gingivalis. The results demonstrated that CQA exhibited substantial anti-proteinase activity and had a prolonged inhibitory effect on P. gingivalis.39

The effect of 4-CQA of M. oleifera on Lys-gingipain has not been elucidated. The current study focused on the impact of CQA in M. oleifera on proteinase Lys-gingipain of P. gingivalis by in silico docking and dynamic simulation study. Based on the present findings, 4-CQA, a phenolic extract of M. oleifera, has been demonstrated to be a potent inhibitor of Lys-gingipain from P. gingivalis. The protein and the ligand exhibited a strong binding affinity for each other, as well as for amino acid residues like ALA 1440, PRO 1439, TRP 1442, and GLY 1451 by forming a hydrogen bond with the hydroxyl groups of the aromatic rings. The compound exhibited a docking score of −6.6 kcal/mol. According to the results of the RMSD plot, the compound demonstrated stability at 60 ns within the 1.0–3.0 Å range.

In subsequent in vivo studies, M. oleifera extracts can be applied topically to the periodontal pockets in the form of fibers, thermo-reversible gels, chips, or nanoparticle mouthwashes40 to test their efficacy against periodontal pathogens.

Limitations

The present study was able to assess the interaction between the protein and the ligand in an in silico molecular docking model. However, further research is necessary to confirm the bioactivity between P. gingivalis and 4-CQA in an in vitro design. Additionally, given that the blind docking technique was employed in this stage, future studies may utilize active site docking to evaluate the specific protein binding efficiency.

Conclusions

In recent years, ethnomedicine has emerged as a novel approach to prevent multi-drug resistance while treating various diseases, including periodontitis. This study concludes that 4-CQA, a phenolic extract acquired from the leaves of M. oleifera, could be used as a potent, novel and natural inhibitor of Lys-gingipain to prevent the progression of periodontitis.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Use of AI and AI-assisted technologies

Not applicable.

Tables


Table 1. Hydrophobic interactions between the amino acid residues of the protein and the ligand

Index

Residue

Amino acid

Distance
[pm]

Ligand atom

Protein atom

1

1438A

ILE

3.77

1608

108

2

1438A

ILE

3.58

1607

111

ILE – isoleucine.
Table 2. Hydrogen bonding between the amino acid residues of the protein and the ligand

Index

Residue

Amino acid

H–A distance
[pm]

D–A distance
[pm]

Donor angle

Protein donor

Side chain

Donor atom

Acceptor atom

1

1439A

PRO

2.88

3.62

134.07

no

no

1618

1161 (O2)

2

1444A

THR

2.10

2.92

137.58

yes

no

163

1617 (O2)

3

1453A

ASN

2.31

3.16

142.28

yes

yes

241

1620 (O3)

4

1453A

ASN

2.89

3.80

151.84

yes

no

235

1622 (O3)

5

1455A

THR

3.05

3.75

127.62

yes

yes

268

1619 (O3)

6

1456A

THR

3.18

4.09

152.24

yes

no

271

1616 (O3)

PRO – proline; THR – threonine; ASN – asparagine; H–A distance – distance between the hydrogen bond and the acceptor atom; D–A distance – distance between the donor and the acceptor atom.

Figures


Fig. 1. Three-dimensional docking model of the protein–ligand interaction of Lys-gingipain and 4-caffeoylquinic acid (4-CQA)
Fig. 2. Three-dimensional docking model of the ligand–protein interaction of Lys-gingipain and 4-CQA
Fig. 3. Two-dimensional model of interactions between the binding site residues of the protein and the ligand
The dotted green and purple lines represent hydrogen bonding and π–π interactions, respectively. SER – serine; ALA – alanine; ILE – isoleucine; PRO – proline; THR – threonine; ASN – asparagine; GLY – glysine; TRP – tryptophan; LYS – lysine.
Fig. 4. Three-dimensional model of interactions between the binding site residues of the protein and the ligand
The grey lines represent unknown interactions between the protein and the ligand, which may also play a major role in their binding.
Fig. 5. Root mean square deviation (RMSD) plot of the protein and the ligand
Ca – calcium ion; (Lig) fit on prot – ligand fitted onto the protein. The Ca serves as a cofactor in the protein’s active site.

References (40)

  1. Nunn ME. Understanding the etiology of periodontitis: An overview of periodontal risk factors. Periodontol 2000. 2003;32:11–23. doi:10.1046/j.0906-6713.2002.03202.x
  2. Gerritsen AE, Allen PF, Witter DJ, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NHJ. Tooth loss and oral health-related quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:126. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-126
  3. Nath SG, Raveendran R. Microbial dysbiosis in periodontitis. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013;17(4):543–545. doi:10.4103/0972-124X.118334
  4. Mohanty R, Asopa SJ, Joseph MD, et al. Red complex: Polymicrobial conglomerate in oral flora: A review. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(11):3480–3486. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_759_19
  5. Rafiei M, Kiani F, Sayehmiri F, Sayehmiri K, Sheikhi A, Zamanian Azodi M. Study of Porphyromonas gingivalis in periodontal diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:62. doi:10.18869/mjiri.31.62
  6. Li N, Collyer CA. Gingipains from Porphyromonas gingivalis – complex domain structures confer diverse functions. Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2011;1(1):41–58. doi:10.1556/EuJMI.1.2011.1.7
  7. Li N, Yun P, Jeffries CM, et al. The modular structure of haemagglutinin/adhesin regions in gingipains of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Mol Microbiol. 2011;81(5):1358–1373. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07768.x
  8. Jia L, Han N, Du J, Guo L, Luo Z, Liu Y. Pathogenesis of important virulence factors of Porphyromonas gingivalis via toll-like receptors. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:262. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2019.00262
  9. Shi Y, Ratnayake DB, Okamoto K, Abe N, Yamamoto K, Nakayama K. Genetic analyses of proteolysis, hemoglobin binding, and hemagglutination of Porphyromonas gingivalis: Construction of mutants with a combination of rgpA, rgpB, kgp, and hagA. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(25):17955–17960. doi:10.1074/jbc.274.25.17955
  10. Mahendra J, Mahendra L, Mugri MH, et al. Role of periodontal bacteria, viruses, and placental mir155 in chronic periodontitis and preeclampsia – a genetic microbiological study. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2021;43(2):831–844. doi:10.3390/cimb43020060
  11. Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Lang NP. Surgical and nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Learned and unlearned concepts. Periodontol 2000. 2013;62(1):218–231. doi:10.1111/prd.12008
  12. Eid Abdelmagyd HA, Ram Shetty S, Musa Musleh Al-Ahmari M. Herbal medicine as adjunct in periodontal therapies – A review of clinical trials in past decade. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019;9(3):212–217. doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.05.001
  13. Manjunatha VA, Vemanaradhya GG, Gowda TM. Clinical and antioxidant efficacy of 4% mangosteen gel as a local drug delivery in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: A placebo-controlled, split-mouth trial. Dent Med Probl. 2022;59(1):111–119. doi:10.17219/dmp/139198
  14. Anil L, Vandana KL. In vitro assessment of herbal extracts in periodontics using antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and antioxidant activities: An insight. Acta Sci Dent Sci. 2022;6(7):25–38. https://actascientific.com/ASDS/ASDS-06-1403.php. Accessed June 16, 2023.
  15. Modi DC, Patel JK, Shah BN, Nayak BS. Phytopharmacology of Moringa oleifera – an edible plant. Pharmacologyonline. 2010;2:692–705. https://pharmacologyonline.silae.it/files/newsletter/2010/vol2/75.Modi.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2023.
  16. Stohs SJ, Hartman MJ. Review of the safety and efficacy of Moringa oleifera. Phytother Res. 2015;29(6):796–804. doi:10.1002/ptr.5325
  17. Miyamae Y, Kurisu M, Han J, Isoda H, Shigemori H. Structure-activity relationship of caffeoylquinic acids on the accelerating activity on ATP production. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2011;59(4):502–507. doi:10.1248/cpb.59.502
  18. da Silva FM, Iorio NLP, Lobo LA, et al. Antibacterial effect of aqueous extracts and bioactive chemical compounds of Coffea canephora against microorganisms involved in dental caries and periodontal disease. Adv Microbiol. 2014;4(14):978–985. doi:10.4236/aim.2014.414109
  19. Morris GM, Lim-Wilby M. Molecular docking. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;443:365–382. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-177-2_19
  20. Tan SA, Yam HC, Cheong SL, et al. Inhibition of Porphyromonas gingivalis peptidyl arginine deiminase, a virulence factor, by antioxidant-rich Cratoxylum cochinchinense: In vitro and in silico evaluation. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022;29(4):2573–2581. doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.12.037
  21. How KY, Song KP, Chan KG. Porphyromonas gingivalis: An overview of periodontopathic pathogen below the gum line. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:53. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.0005
  22. Dewan M, Pandit AK, Goyal L. Association of periodontitis and gingivitis with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Med Probl. 2024;61(3):407–415. doi:10.17219/dmp/158793
  23. Hajishengallis G, Darveau RP, Curtis MA. The keystone-pathogen hypothesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10(10):717–725. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2873
  24. Boutaga K, van Winkelhoff AJ, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJE, Savelkoul PHM. Comparison of real-time PCR and culture for detection of Porphyromonas gingivalis in subgingival plaque samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(11):4950–4954. doi:10.1128/JCM.41.11.4950-4954.2003
  25. Holt SC, Kesavalu L, Walker S, Genco CA. Virulence factors of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Periodontol 2000. 1999;20:168–238. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0757.1999.tb00162.x
  26. Lamont RJ, Jenkinson HF. Life below the gum line: Pathogenic mechanisms of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62(4):1244–1263. doi:10.1128/MMBR.62.4.1244-1263.1998
  27. Potempa J, Sroka A, Imamura T, Travis J. Gingipains, the major cysteine proteinases and virulence factors of Porphyromonas gingivalis: Structure, function and assembly of multidomain protein complexes. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2003;4(6):397–407. doi:10.2174/1389203033487036
  28. Potempa J, Banbula A, Travis J. Role of bacterial proteinases in matrix destruction and modulation of host responses. Periodontol 2000. 2000;24:153–192. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0757.2000.2240108.x
  29. Olsen I, Potempa J. Strategies for the inhibition of gingipains for the potential treatment of periodontitis and associated systemic diseases. J Oral Microbiol. 2014;6(1):24800. doi:10.3402/jom.v6.24800
  30. Guevara T, Rodríguez-Banqueri A, Lasica AM, et al. Structural determinants of inhibition of Porphyromonas gingivalis gingipain K by KYT-36, a potent, selective, and bioavailable peptidase inhibitor. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4935. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-41354-3
  31. Taiyoji M, Yamanaka T, Tsuno T, Ohtsubo S. Potential value of a rice protein extract, containing proteinaceous inhibitors against cysteine proteinases from Porphyromonas gingivalis, for managing periodontal diseases. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2013;77(1):80–86. doi:10.1271/bbb.120585
  32. Nakatsuka Y, Nagasawa T, Yumoto Y, Nakazawa F, Furuichi Y. Inhibitory effects of sword bean extract on alveolar bone resorption induced in rats by Porphyromonas gingivalis infection. J Periodontal Res. 2014;49(6):801–809. doi:10.1111/jre.12166
  33. Yamanaka A, Kouchi T, Kasai K, Kato T, Ishihara K, Okuda K. Inhibitory effect of cranberry polyphenol on biofilm formation and cysteine proteases of Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Periodontal Res. 2007;42(6):589–592. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0765.2007.00982.x
  34. Kashyap P. Phytochemical and GC-MS analysis of Rhododendron arboreum flowers. 2018. https://www.academia.edu/36048853/Phytochemical_and_GC_MS_analysis_of_Rhododendron_arboreum_flowers. Accessed June 16, 2023.
  35. Naveed M, Hejazi V, Abbas M, et al. Chlorogenic acid (CGA): A pharmacological review and call for further research. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;97:67–74. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.064
  36. Kashiwada Y, Ahmed FA, Kurimoto S, et al. New α-glucosides of caffeoyl quinic acid from the leaves of Moringa oleifera Lam. J Nat Med. 2012;66(1):217–221. doi:10.1007/s11418-011-0563-5
  37. Wianowska D, Gil M. Recent advances in extraction and analysis procedures of natural chlorogenic acids. Phytochem Rev. 2019;18(1):273–302. doi:10.1007/s11101-018-9592-z
  38. Song J, Kim B, Kim O, et al. Effect of coffee on lipopolysaccharide-induced immortalized human oral keratinocytes. Foods. 2022;11(15):2199. doi:10.3390/foods11152199
  39. Tsou SH, Hu SW, Yang JJ, Yan M, Lin YY. Potential oral health care agent from coffee against virulence factor of periodontitis. Nutrients. 2019;11(9):2235. doi:10.3390/nu11092235
  40. Ramamurthy SP, Sekar P, Ulaganathan A, Varghese S, Kadhiresan. Formulation of in-situ thermoreversible gel with Moringa oleifera Lam extract as a local drug delivery system for adjunct periodontal treatment. J Clin Diagn Res. 2022;16(12):ZC01–ZC06. doi:10.7860/jcdr/2022/58589.17206