Dental and Medical Problems

Dent Med Probl
Index Copernicus (ICV 2021) – 132.50
MEiN – 70 pts
CiteScore (2021) – 2.0
JCI (2021) – 0.5
Average rejection rate (2022) – 79.69%
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – quarterly

Download original text (EN)

Dental and Medical Problems

2022, vol. 59, nr 4, October-December, p. 657–661

doi: 10.17219/dmp/138636

Publication type: review

Language: English

License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Cite as:

Morales-Salazar SA, Monteagudo-Sangama JM, Arriola-Guillén LE. Influence of dentofacial characteristics on the appearance of selfreported bullying: A review. Dent Med Probl. 2022;59(4):657–661. doi:10.17219/dmp/138636

Influence of dentofacial characteristics on the appearance of self-reported bullying: A review

Sisley Antonieta Morales-Salazar1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Judith Milagros Monteagudo-Sangama1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén2,3,A,B,C,D,E,F

1 Student of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Scientific University of the South (Universidad Científica del Sur), Lima, Peru

2 Division of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Scientific University of the South (Universidad Científica del Sur), Lima, Peru

3 Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Scientific University of the South (Universidad Científica del Sur), Lima, Peru


Bullying is a social problem that affects children and adolescents in particular. It deteriorates the selfesteem of its victims, decreases their quality of life and generates future psychological problems. The aim of this review was to determine the influence of dentofacial characteristics on the appearance of selfreported bullying through a literature review. A systematic search was carried out in the databases of international scientific literature on health sciences, including MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, and SciELO. Up to October 10, 2020, a total of 348 articles were identified, but only 36 were ultimately selected for the review. Specific keywords in English were used in the search: “dentofacial features”; “soft tissue”; and “malocclusion”. It was found that the appearance of bullying was associated with altered facial profiles, namely the presence of different classes of malocclusion, with class II or class III malocclusion being the most impactful. Altered dentofacial characteristics can make an individual the target of harassment, leading to low quality of life, emotional instability, low self-esteem, and the lack of confidence with regard to dentofacial appearance as well as poor long-term social and academic performance. There is a need to develop preventive measures that would be applied by both parents and authorities, with disseminating information on bullying in schools as well as on adequate oral hygiene and the importance of going to the dentist. Traditional and cybernetic bullying share similarities. While working out strategies against bullying, it is essential to raise awareness among victims and bullies, families, and society, and to determine how bullying is perceived by children and teenagers.

Key words

bullying, malocclusion, dentofacial alteration, labial incompetence, self-reported bullying

References (52)

  1. Wolke D, Lereya ST. Long-term effects of bullying. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(9):879–885. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2014-306667
  2. Rettew DC, Pawlowski S. Bullying. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2016;25(2):235–242. doi:10.1016/j.chc.2015.12.002
  3. United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF). Cyberbullying: What is it and how to stop it. What teens want to know about cyberbullying. Accessed January 14, 2021.
  4. Suzuki K, Asaga R, Sourander A, Hoven CW, Mandell D. Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2012;24(1):27–35. doi:10.1515/ijamh.2012.005
  5. Da Silva JL, de Oliveira WA, de Malta Mello FC, do Prado RR, Iossi Silva MA, Malta DC. Prevalence of practice of bullying reported by Brazilian students: Data from the National School Health Survey, 2015. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2019;28(2):e2018178. doi:10.5123/S1679-49742019000200005
  6. Borges Bottino SM, Bottino CM, Regina CG, Lobo Correia AV, Ribeiro WS. Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health: Systematic review. Cad Saude Publica. 2015;31(3):463–475. doi:10.1590/0102-311x00036114
  7. Bullying scientifically linked to malocclusion. Br Dent J. 2011;211(12):587. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.1071
  8. Aboujaoude E, Savage MW, Starcevic V, Salame WO. Cyberbullying: Review of an old problem gone viral. J Adolesc Health. 2015;57(1):10–18. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.011
  9. Sentse M, Dijkstra JK, Salmivalli C, Cillessen AH. The dynamics of friendships and victimization in adolescence: A longitudinal social network perspective. Aggress Behav. 2013;39(3):229–238. doi:10.1002/ab.21469
  10. Buelga S, Cava MJ, Musitu G. Cyberbullying: Adolescent victimization through mobile phone and internet [in Spanish]. Psicothema. 2010;22(4):784–749. PMID:21044514.
  11. Gupta T, Sadana G, Rai HK. Effect of esthetic defects in anterior teeth on the emotional and social well-being of children: A survey. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;12(3):229–232. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1628
  12. Onyeaso CO, Sanu OO. Psychosocial implications of malocclusion among 12–18 year old secondary school children in Ibadan, Nigeria. Odontostomatol Trop. 2005;28(109):39–48. PMID:16032946.
  13. Duarte-Rodrigues L, Ramos-Jorge ML, Alves-Duarte AC, Fonseca-Silva T, Flores-Mir C, Marques LS. Oral disorders associated with the experience of verbal bullying among Brazilian school-aged children: A case–control study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020;151(6):399–406. doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2020.02.001
  14. Al-Bitar ZB, Al-Omari IK, Sonbol HN, Al-Ahmad HT, Cunningham SJ. Bullying among Jordanian schoolchildren, its effects on school performance, and the contribution of general physical and dentofacial features. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144(6):872–878. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.08.016
  15. Seehra J, Newton JT, DiBiase AT. Bullying in schoolchildren – its relationship to dental appearance and psychosocial implications: An update for GDPs. Br Dent J. 2011;210(9):411–415. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.339
  16. Agou S, Locker D, Streiner DL, Tompson B. Impact of self-esteem on the oral-health-related quality of life of children with malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(4):484–489. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.11.021
  17. Shaw WC. The influence of children’s dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod. 1981;79(4):399–415. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(81)90382-1
  18. Tristão SK, Magno MB, Braga Pintor AV, et al. Is there a relationship between malocclusion and bullying? A systematic review. Prog Orthod. 2020;21(1):26. doi:10.1186/s40510-020-00323-7
  19. Ribeiro-Lages MB, Martins ML, Magno MB, et al. Is there association between dental malocclusion and bruxism? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2020;47(10):1304–1318. doi:10.1111/joor.12971
  20. Broadbent JM. Chewing and occlusal function. Funct Orthod. 2000;17(4):34–39. PMID:11307270.
  21. Bergman RT, Waschak J, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Murphy NC. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(1):48–55. doi:10.2319/041513-291.1
  22. Hamid S, Abuaffan AH. Facial soft tissue thickness in a sample of Sudanese adults with different occlusions. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266:209–214. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.05.018
  23. Kurkcuoglu A, Pelin C, Ozener B, Zagyapan R, Sahinoglu Z, Yazici AC. Facial soft tissue thickness in individuals with different occlusion patterns in adult Turkish subjects. Homo. 2011;62(4):288–297. doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2011.06.001
  24. Perović T. The influence of class II division 2 malocclusions on the harmony of the human face profile. Med Sci Monit. 2017;23:5589–5598. doi:10.12659/msm.905453
  25. Seehra J, Fleming PS, Newton T, DiBiase AT. Bullying in orthodontic patients and its relationship to malocclusion, self-esteem and oral health-related quality of life. J Orthod. 2011;38(4):247–256;quiz 294. doi:10.1179/14653121141641
  26. Seehra J, Newton JT, Dibiase AT. Interceptive orthodontic treatment in bullied adolescents and its impact on self-esteem and oral-health-related quality of life. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35(5):615–621. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjs051
  27. DiBiase AT, Sandler PJ. Malocclusion, orthodontics and bullying. Dent Update. 2001;28(9):464–466. doi:10.12968/denu.2001.28.9.464
  28. Al-Omari IK, Al-Bitar ZB, Sonbol HN, Al-Ahmad HT, Cunningham SJ, Al-Omiri M. Impact of bullying due to dentofacial features on oral health-related quality of life. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;146(6):734–749. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.08.011
  29. Hidalgo-Rasmussen C, Molina T, Molina R, et al. Influence of bullying on the quality of life perception of Chilean students [in Spanish]. Rev Med Chil. 2015;143(6):716–723. doi:10.4067/S0034-98872015000600004
  30. Frisén A, Bjarnelind S. Health-related quality of life and bullying in adolescence. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99(4):597–603. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01664.x
  31. Schoeler T, Choi SW, Dudbridge F, et al. Multi-polygenic score approach to identifying individual vulnerabilities associated with the risk of exposure to bullying. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(7):730–738. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0310
  32. Lee SH, Ju HJ. Mothers’ difficulties and expectations for intervention of bullying among young children in South Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(6):924. doi:10.3390/ijerph16060924
  33. Kaufman TM, Kretschmer T, Huitsing G, Veenstra R. Why does a universal anti-bullying program not help all children? Explaining persistent victimization during an intervention. Prev Sci. 2018;19(6):822–832. doi:10.1007/s11121-018-0906-5
  34. Bender D, Lösel F. Bullying at school as a predictor of delinquency, violence and other anti-social behaviour in adulthood. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2011;21(2):99–106. doi:10.1002/cbm.799
  35. Chaux E, Velásquez AM, Schultze-Krumbholz A, Scheithauer H. Effects of the cyberbullying prevention program Media Heroes (Medienhelden) on traditional bullying. Aggress Behav. 2016;42(2):157–165. doi:10.1002/ab.21637
  36. Lee S, Kim CJ, Kim DH. A meta-analysis of the effect of school-based anti-bullying programs. J Child Health Care. 2015;19(2):136–153. doi:10.1177/1367493513503581
  37. Ybarra ML, Espelage DL, Valido A, Hong JS, Prescott TL. Perceptions of middle school youth about school bullying. J Adolesc. 2019;75:175–187. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.10.008
  38. Thapa K, Kelvin EA. Peer victimization and unhealthy weight control behaviors – the role of intersecting identities among New York City youth. J Urban Health. 2017;94(4):506–513. doi:10.1007/s11524-017-0163-0
  39. Peters ZJ, Hatzenbuehler ML, Davidson LL. Examining the intersection of bullying and physical relationship violence among New York City high school students. J Interpers Violence. 2017;32(1):49–75. doi:10.1177/0886260515585532
  40. Earnshaw VA, Bogart LM, Poteat VP, Reisner SL, Schuster MA. Bullying among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016;63(6):999–1010. doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2016.07.004
  41. Bhui K, Silva MJ, Harding S, Stansfeld S. Bullying, social support, and psychological distress: Findings from RELACHS cohorts of East London’s White British and Bangladeshi adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2017;61(3):317–328. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.03.009
  42. Vitoroulis I, Vaillancourt T. Ethnic group differences in bullying perpetration: A meta-analysis. J Res Adolesc. 2018;28(4):752–771. doi:10.1111/jora.12393
  43. Vitoroulis I, Vaillancourt T. Meta-analytic results of ethnic group differences in peer victimization. Aggress Behav. 2015;41(2):149–170. doi:10.1002/ab.21564
  44. Thomas HJ, Connor JP, Lawrence DM, Hafekost JM, Zubrick SR, Scott JG. Prevalence and correlates of bullying victimisation and perpetration in a nationally representative sample of Australian youth. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017;51(9):909–920. doi:10.1177/0004867417707819
  45. Maïano C, Aimé A, Salvas MC, Morin AJ, Normand CL. Prevalence and correlates of bullying perpetration and victimization among school-aged youth with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Res Dev Disabil. 2016;49–50:181–195. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.015
  46. Maïano C, Normand CL, Salvas MC, Moullec G, Aimé A. Prevalence of school bullying among youth with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autism Res. 2016;9(6):601–615. doi:10.1002/aur.1568
  47. Park I, Gong J, Lyons GL, et al. Prevalence of and factors associated with school bullying in students with autism spectrum disorder: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. Yonsei Med J. 2020;61(11):909–922. doi:10.3349/ymj.2020.61.11.909
  48. Nascimento M, Dahllöf G, Soares FC, Andrade de Souza Mayer TM, Kvist T, Colares V. Self-reported symptoms of temporomandibular pain and jaw dysfunction in adolescents are associated with exposure to violence. J Oral Rehabil. 2021;48(7):765–773. doi:10.1111/joor.13171
  49. Alonso LS, Serra-Negra JM, Abreu LG, Martins IM, Gonçalves Tourino LF, Vale MP. Association between possible awake bruxism and bullying among 8- to 11-year-old children/adolescents. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022;32(1):41–48. doi:10.1111/ipd.12789
  50. Moraes RB, Knorst JK, Brondani B, et al. Relationship between gingival bleeding and associated factors with reports of verbal bullying in adolescents. J Periodontol. 2021;92(2):225–233. doi:10.1002/JPER.19-0745
  51. Folayan MO, Oginni O, Arowolo O, El Tantawi M. Association between adverse childhood experiences, bullying, self-esteem, resilience, social support, caries and oral hygiene in children and adolescents in sub-urban Nigeria. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):202. doi:10.1186/s12903-020-01160-0
  52. Srabstein JC, Leventhal BL. Prevention of bullying-related morbidity and mortality: A call for public health policies. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(6):403. doi:10.2471/BLT.10.077123