Dental and Medical Problems

Dent Med Probl
Index Copernicus (ICV 2020) – 128.41
MEiN – 70 pts
CiteScore (2021) – 2.0
JCI – 0.5
Average rejection rate (2021) – 81.35%
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – quarterly

Download original text (EN)

Dental and Medical Problems

2021, vol. 58, nr 3, July-September, p. 405–410

doi: 10.17219/dmp/134789

Publication type: review

Language: English

License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Cite as:


Londoño-Candonaza FE, Fiori-Chincaro GA, Agudelo-Botero AM, Llaguno-Rubio J, Arriola-Guillén LE. Occupational health in oral radiologists: A review. Dent Med Probl. 2021;58(3):405–410. doi:10.17219/dmp/134789

Occupational health in oral radiologists: A review

Flor Euclibia Londoño-Candonaza1,2,A,B,C,D,E,F, Gustavo Adolfo Fiori-Chincaro1,2,A,B,C,D,E,F, Ana María Agudelo-Botero1,2,A,C,D,E,F, Jhoana Llaguno-Rubio1,2,A,B,C,D,E,F, Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén1,2,A,B,C,D,E,F

1 Division of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Scientific University of the South, Lima, Peru

2 Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Scientific University of the South, Lima, Peru

Abstract

Work is a fundamental axis for the development of societies and human well-being, but if a person cannot adapt to their work area and work environment, the individual may be affected by occupational or co-existing illnesses that get exacerbated when working.

A scientific search was conducted in the main health databases – MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, SciELO, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Dialnet – using the keywords “occupational health”, “occupational diseases”, “occupational accidents” AND “oral radiology” OR “oral radiologists”. Systematic reviews as well as observational, cross-sectional and longitudinal studies were included. Case reports, letters to the editor, editorials, and opinion articles were excluded. In total, 496 articles were recovered, and only 51 fulfilled the selection criteria. Signs and symptoms that affect oral radiologists include back pain, shoulder pain, wrist pain, tenosynovitis, computer vision syndrome (CVS), stress, depression, and burnout syndrome. Preventive occupational health (OH) measures are proposed to help eliminate or alleviate the symptoms associated with non-ergonomic habits at work. Oral radiologists are exposed to several risks and occupational diseases inherent and/or related to their work. By implementing simple habits and ergonomic advice, well-documented in the literature, these risks can be avoided.

This review aimed to provide scientific information on the current concepts of OH in oral radiologists in order to help prevent occupational diseases and occupational accidents, and guarantee safe professional practice.

Keywords: occupational health, ergonomics, radiology, dental staff

Introduction

Work plays an especially important role in the development of human societies. As knowledge and technology advance, the forms, modes and environments of work also advance.1 It has been shown that the health of workers is conditioned by different social and individual factors as well as by access to health services, and the forms, modes and environments of work.2, 3

Occupational health (OH) has been defined by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) as the promotion and maintenance of the highest degree of physical, mental and social well-being of workers in all occupations by preventing deviations from health, controlling risks, and adapting work to people and people to their work positions.3, 4, 5 Since OH is based on the law, each country has its decrees, laws and regulations, created according to the guidelines of the United Nations (UN), the European Union (EU) and the Organization of American States (OAS), which are major international mainstays for countries.4, 6, 7

The International Labor Organization (ILO) has classified occupational diseases into the following groups: those caused by chemical, physical or biological agents; infectious or parasitic diseases; respiratory diseases; skin diseases; musculoskeletal disorders; mental and behavioral disorders; occupational cancer; and diseases caused by other substances and agents, not included in any of the abovementioned sections. There are also other diseases, not included on this list, that may be related to work activities.5, 7, 8, 9

Oral radiology is a discipline that involves the diagnosis of the diseases and disorders of the mouth, face and jaws with the use of X-rays and other types of radiological techniques. Apart from diagnosing a disease, radiological examinations enable the development of treatment plans and the monitoring of the evolution of lesions and the disease over time.6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 This profession presents many inherent risks related to the occurrence of diseases and work-associated accidents, which may imply immediate or long-term problems. Moreover, an important aspect to consider is that health professionals, including oral radiologists, live in a competitive environment that is highly demanding and seeks perfection in their daily work; this leads to high levels of emotional stress.15, 16, 17, 18 In addition, the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on mental health, and consequently on the professional practice of the whole medical staff, must be taken into consideration.19, 20, 21

This review evaluates the discomfort, illnesses and occupational problems derived from the practice of oral radiology, and proposes some ergonomic recommendations.1, 3, 7, 8, 14 Further, the purpose of this review was to provide scientific information on the current concepts of OH in oral radiologists in order to help prevent occupational diseases and occupational accidents, and guarantee safe professional practice.

Methodology

A literature search was carried out using the main sources of scientific information, such as MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, SciELO, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Dialnet, and search terms with a date limitation of the last 10 years to include information regarding OH and oral radiology. The keywords used were “occupational health”, “occupational diseases”, “occupational accidents”, “ergonomic”, “oral radiology”, and “oral radiologists”. Systematic reviews as well as observational, cross-sectional and longitudinal studies were included. Case reports, letters to the editor, editorials, and opinion articles were excluded. Thus, 496 articles were recovered, of which only 51 fulfilled the selection criteria. These studies were included to evaluate the development of theoretical topics. The bibliographic search was carried out until December 5, 2020 (Figure 1).

General aspects
of occupational health

In recent decades, globalization, technology, the diversification of societies, demographic changes, and the overcrowding of cities have exerted a strong impact on the workplace, leading to the concept of work ethics. This concept is important, since it seeks to balance the risks and benefits between the interested or contracting parties, which, in this case, involve employees and employers.7

Work is linked with health and can affect not only physical health, but also mental health due to the transfer of workload to home or other personal spheres. Epidemiological studies have shown that the morbidity and mortality of a population are closely related to labor demands. Occupational accidents due to inadequate working conditions, or worker or employer negligence, can not only have strong repercussions on health, but can also end life.8, 9

Access to health services adds to the quality of life of populations, families and workers. A study carried out in 17 countries of EU evaluated the health systems of each country and reported that while worker healthcare was mandatory, annual controls to assess the work capacity of workers, and human, institutional and infrastructure resources were insufficient.10, 11

Occupational diseases
in oral radiology

Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms refer to muscular, nerve, cartilaginous, bone, tendon, vascular, or joint-related discomfort in various parts of the body and the human support system that are mainly attributable to the work environment and increasingly worsen over time. Over time, musculoskeletal complaints can become long-term degenerative disorders that decrease productivity at work.12

In the study by Al Shammari et al, the most prevalent discomfort reported by radiologists was lumbar pain, pain in the upper extremities and the carpal tunnel, and tenosynovitis.13 Other studies described pain in the lower back and the spine as well as the neck, as repetitive stress injuries.14, 22 According to various studies, radiologists most frequently report pain or discomfort at least once a week in the neck (66%), the lower back (61%), the upper back (43%), the right shoulder (36%), and the right wrist (33%).13, 23

Stress is becoming more and more common in the workplace. It has been reported that 55% of radiologists experience symptoms related to stress and exhaustion. Stress often results in physical and emotional consequences, including cardiovascular problems, the lack of sleep, and in extreme cases, severe psychological disorders. The associated risk factors for stress are feeling undervalued, feeling belittled, the inability to achieve goals, experiencing barriers that prevent the person from performing their work and achieving personal development, working conditions, unfair work rules, and loneliness, which combined, can generate synergy.24, 25

Clinical depression can also affect radiologists, with the most common diagnostic criteria being a depressed mood most of the time, the loss of pleasure, the loss of interest in most of the daily activities, slowing down in carrying out daily activities, a decreased appetite, an unjustified weight loss, permanent insomnia or hypersomnia, restlessness, fatigue and tiredness almost every day and all day, a decreased ability to think, concentrate or make decisions, feelings of guilt and low self-worth, and thoughts of death (the fear of death or suicidal thoughts). A professional is defined as having depression with the presentation of 5 or more of these criteria for a period of 2 or more weeks.26, 27

Burnout syndrome involves chronic work stress that affects a person in all facets of their life, both in the work environment and outside. Some of the consequences of this syndrome are low self-esteem, low energy, the inability to fall asleep, permanent fatigue, weakness, a feeling of frustration, negative attitudes, increased irritability, the degeneration of social relationships, the loss of motivation with regard to life affairs, and depression.28 This syndrome has 3 components: emotional exhaustion, a feeling of frustration, and a negative attitude toward oneself and others.29 In South America, the stress levels associated with burnout syndrome are low among radiologists30, 31; however, high levels of burnout have been reported in Canada, both in apprentices and professionals.32, 33 On the other hand, in India, 54% of radiologists report repetitive stress injuries, 52% of which are accompanied by pain in the neck.34

Computer vision syndrome (CVS) has been defined by the American Optometric Association (AOA) as a set of ocular and visual problems related to activities involving near vision, and is experienced while using computers.35 The manifested symptoms are headache, difficulty in focusing, dry eyes, red eyes, irritated eyes, double vision, and blurred vision, all of which are strongly related to the number of hours in front of a screen. Among Canadian radiologists, the prevalence of CVS is 36%.36, 37, 38

Metabolic syndrome describes several conditions that include hyperglycemia, high triglyceride and cholesterol levels, obesity, and hypertension. These parameters are found to be higher in professionals with a higher degree of work stress. It has been described that 7.1% of radiologists have metabolic syndrome, presenting 3 or more simultaneous pathological metabolic abnormalities.39 More scientific evidence on metabolic syndrome among radiologists is required.

Despite the advent of digital radiology, the use of analog radiology is still common today in many parts of the world. Therefore, the working conditions and the substances used for image processing can affect the health of radiologists. Some of the symptoms described include headaches, a sore throat, a shortness of breath, skin rash, a bad taste in the mouth (chemical taste), a runny nose, itchy eyes, nausea, asthma, fatigue, watery eyes, a persistently stuffy nose, a persistently itchy nose, and sneezing, which are collectively known as “darkroom disease”.40

Additionally, an important aspect to consider is that health professionals, including oral radiologists, have been negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The disease has had a significant effect on mental health of the whole medical staff, and consequently on professional practice.19, 20, 21 Therefore, a good, healthy and comfortable work environment is required.

Ergonomics in dental radiology

The International Ergonomics Association (IEA) defines ergonomics as the scientific discipline of studying the individuals’ relationships, interactions and adaptations with/to the work environment and each of the elements that compose it, in order to guarantee human well-being and the productivity of the system, to achieve maximum efficiency in terms of the use of movements, space and time, to minimize physical and mental stress, and to prevent occupational diseases, which can be very difficult to treat once they appear.41

In the work setting, equipment must be close by, and must be silent and acoustic.42 Good lighting, including that of the ambient light sources, screens and monitors, is important. A balance between screen lighting and ambient lighting ensures that the radiologist can observe small details. More studies are required to determine the standard maximum luminance of radiological equipment.35, 43, 44

To avoid the symptoms associated with CVS, it is recommended to blink continuously, making this exercise a conscious act. A short break should be made by observing distant objects for at least 5 minutes every 2 hours. Computer screens should be placed below the eye level, i.e., the top edge of the monitor should be below the eye level and further from the eyes than the bottom edge so that there is a downward angle of 14°. The optimum distance from the monitor to the eyes should be at arm’s length, or 76–101.5 cm away with a 5-millimeter font size.45, 46, 47

Radiologists should perform a simple stretching exercise every hour of work.48, 49 The chairs utilized by radiologists must be adjustable. Whilst sitting, the radiologist’s feet must not dangle, but rather must be supported on the ground forming an angle of 90–105° between the calves and the thighs. The use of arm supports relieves the effort of the muscles of the back. Curved chairs cause upper body ailments, whereas flat chairs cause lower body ailments.50, 51 An optimal working environment has a temperature of 20–25°C with 40–60% humidity.43, 52, 53 Noise should be minimized as much as possible; however, the maximum noise threshold that should be allowed at the workstation is 58 dB.54, 55, 56 When using the mouse, the hand and the wrist should be positioned possibly parallel to the desk. A mouse with a slight increase in height in the most anterior part is recommended (Table 1).57, 58, 59, 60

Occupational medical services for medical professionals, including radiologists, should focus on mental health for the early detection of depression, stress, chronic exhaustion, bipolar disorder, psychoactive substance abuse, alcoholism, self-medication to feel good as well as suicide risk factors.

Situations related to lawsuits or possible lawsuits should be managed. Long work hours should be avoided and sufficient sleep is essential. Efforts must be made to maintain a balance between work and family life. A healthy lifestyle must also be promoted by getting physical activity and controlling any physical illness. Work hierarchies that do not tolerate mistakes must be overcome, and also severe self-criticism should be avoided. From an employer’s point of view, sufficient salary rewarding should be given according to the context, region, functions, and professional title. Additionally, the number of employees should be in accordance with the work volume. Free-time spaces should be available for the members of the work team to integrate. Nighttime and weekend hours must be respected, and interruptions with calls or tasks outside the workplace and working hours should not be made. In addition, tasks that are needed to be done at home must be avoided. Lastly, it is recommended to spend time outdoors to allow contact with the sun. Exposure to sunlight stimulates the secretion of the hormones serotonin and melatonin, which are related to feelings of well-being and happiness, and sleep.

Conclusions

Oral radiologists are exposed to several risks and occupational diseases inherent and/or related to the work. However, these risks can be avoided by the implementation of the well-documented habits and ergonomic advice that improve a person’s overall quality of life.

Tables


Table 1. Occupational diseases and their origin, and recommendations related to the work activities of oral and maxillofacial radiologists

Occupational discomfort

Causes

Ergonomic recommendations

Lower back
and upper limb pain

sustained and bad postures, uncomfortable chairs, desks of insufficient or excessive height, limited space

– a simple stretching exercise and an active break every hour of work

– furniture adjustable to the figure and height of the person

using a chair that can be adjusted to the needs of the person sitting on it and can provide good lumbar support, without causing pressure on the thighs and without the feet hanging; the feet must be supported on the ground at an angle of 90–105°

Carpal tunnel
and tenosynovitis

repetitive movements with the hands, sustained and awkward postures while using the mouse and the keyboard, transcription of reports in a bad posture

– the mouse and the keyboard should be arranged in such a way so that to minimize the deflection, extension and flexion of the wrist

the mouse should be grasped with the dominant hand and the wrist should be positioned possibly parallel to the desk, a mouse with a slight increase in height in the most anterior part is recommended as well as using gel support pads for the wrists

– using a DictaphoneTM

Neck pain

sustained head postures with excessive up or down head movements

– placing the computer screen below the eye level so that to ensure is a 14-degree downward gaze

Burnout syndrome

extended working hours, excessive workload, difficult employment relationships, lack of resources to perform duties properly, neglect of  facets of life other than work

– maintaining a balance between work and family life

– coping with dictatorial hierarchies

– avoiding severe self-criticism

providing sufficient salary rewarding, having a number of employees according to the work volume, allowing spaces for the members of the work team to integrate, respecting nighttime hours and weekends, not interrupting with calls, avoiding tasks to be done at home, outside the workplace and working hours

Clinical depression

endogenous origin or biological, genetically determined predisposition, enhanced by environmental factors or reactive factors that occur in the face of poor adaptation to stressful environmental factors

– occupational medical services regarding mental health focused on medical professionals, including radiologists

– controlling any physical illness

CVS

activities that stress near vision and are related to using computers

– adequate ambient lighting

– full blink, 5-minute breaks every 2 h, yearly eye exams

– using anti-glare filters on monitor screens

– use software that reduces blue light

– temperature of 20–25°C with 40–60% humidity

Suicidal thoughts

depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, psychoactive substance abuse, alcoholism, loneliness

– OH services involving the treatment of depression, bipolar disorder, psychoactive substance abuse, alcoholism, self-medication, and feel-good medication

Metabolic syndrome

high degree of work stress, sedentary lifestyle, unhealthy lifestyle

– promoting a healthy lifestyle

– physical activity

– regular medical exams

CVS – computer vision syndrome; OH – occupational health.

Figures


Fig. 1. Flow chart for collecting information

References (60)

  1. Sandoval-Reyes J, Acosta-Prado JC, Sanchís-Pedregosa C. Relationship amongst technology use, work overload, and psychological detachment from work. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(23):4602. doi:10.3390/ijerph16234602
  2. Burton WN, Chen CY, Li X, Schultz AB. The association of employee engagement at work with health risks and presenteeism. J Occup Environ Med. 2017;59(10):988–992. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000001108
  3. Whysall Z, Bowden J, Hewitt M. Sickness presenteeism: Measurement and management challenges. Ergonomics. 2018;61(3):341–354. doi:10.1080/00140139.2017.1365949
  4. Arenas Massa A, Riveros Ferrada C. Ethical and legal aspects of occupational health [in Spanish]. Pers Bioét. 2017;21(1):62–77.
  5. Lezaun M. Legislation on professional respiratory diseases [in Spanish]. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2005;28(Suppl 1):123–134.
  6. Paz Gallardo C, Celis Contreras C, Schilling Quezada A, Schilling Lara J, Hidalgo Rivas A. Contribution of oral and maxillofacial radio­logy to the clinical diagnosis [in Spanish]. Av Odontoestomatol. 2019;35(2):73–82. doi:10.4321/s0213-12852019000200004
  7. Iavicoli S, Valenti A, Gagliardi D, Rantanen J. Ethics and occupational health in the contemporary world of work. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(8):1713. doi:10.3390/ijerph15081713
  8. Guillén Subiran C. The challenge of managing occupational diseases: Solvitas perambulum [in Spanish]. Med Segur Trab. 2014;60(Suppl 1):144–156. http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0465-546X2014000500021&lng=es. Accessed December 4, 2020.
  9. Palacios Nava ME, Moreno Sánchez AR, Paz Román MDP, García García JJ, Nava Hernández R. Situation of occupational and environmental health in Mexico. Ann Glob Health. 2018;84(3):348–359. doi:10.29024/aogh.2317
  10. Sakowski P, Marcinkiewicz A. Health promotion and prevention in occupational health systems in Europe. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2019;32(3):353–361. doi:10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01384
  11. Rantanen J, Lehtinen S, Valenti A, Iavicoli S. A global survey on occupational health services in selected international commission on occupational health (ICOH) member countries. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):787. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4800-z
  12. Sze G, Bluth EI, Bender CE, Parikh JR. Work-related injuries of radio­logists and possible ergonomic solutions: Recommendations from the ACR Commission on Human Resources. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(10):1353–1358. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.06.021
  13. Al Shammari M, Hassan A, Al Dandan O, Al Gadeeb M, Bubshait D. Musculoskeletal symptoms among radiologists in Saudi Arabia: A multi-center cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20:541. doi:10.1186/s12891-019-2933-1
  14. Creze M, Bedretdinova D, Soubeyrand M, et al. Posture-related stiffness mapping of paraspinal muscles. J Anat. 2019;234(6):787–799. doi:10.1111/joa.12978
  15. Viegas S, Jeddi MZ, Hopf NB, et al. Biomonitoring as an underused exposure assessment tool in occupational safety and health context – challenges and way forward. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):5884. doi:10.3390/ijerph17165884
  16. Zhu B, Fan H, Xie B, Su R, Zhou C, He J. Mapping the scientific research on healthcare workers’ occupational health: A bibliometric and social network analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(8):2625. doi:10.3390/ijerph17082625
  17. Vargas SC, de Oliveira CF, Pollo Renner JD, Franz Krug SB, Possuelo L. Prevalence of occupational infectious diseases among primary oral health care teams and prevention measures. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2020;18(2):149–157. doi:10.47626/1679-4435-2020-546
  18. Shi Y, Xue H, Ma Y, et al. Prevalence of occupational exposure and its influence on job satisfaction among Chinese healthcare workers: A large-sample, cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(4):e031953. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031953
  19. Koh D, Goh HP. Occupational health responses to COVID‑19: What lessons can we learn from SARS? J Occup Health. 2020;62(1):e12128. doi:10.1002/1348-9585.12128
  20. Giorgi G, Lecca LI, Alessio F, et al. COVID‑19-related mental health effects in the workplace: A narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):7857. doi:10.3390/ijerph17217857
  21. Celik V, Ozkars MY. An overlooked risk for healthcare workers amid COVID‑19: Occupational hand eczema. North Clin Istanb. 2020;7(6):527–533. doi:10.14744/nci.2020.45722
  22. Parikh JR, Bender C, Bluth E. Musculoskeletal injuries affecting radiologists according to the 2017 ACR Human Resources Commission workforce survey. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(5):803–808. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2018.01.033
  23. Seidel RL, Krupinski EA. The agony of it all: Musculoskeletal discomfort in the reading room. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(12):1620–1625. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.07.024
  24. Fishman MDC, Mehta TS, Siewert B, Bender CE, Kruskal JB. The road to wellness: Engagement strategies to help radiologists achieve joy at work. Radiographics. 2018;38(6):1651–1664. doi:10.1148/rg.2018180030
  25. Valtorta NK, Kanaan M, Gilbody S, Ronzi S, Hanratty B. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for coronary heart disease and stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal observational stu­dies. Heart. 2016;102(13):1009–1016. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308790
  26. Bender CE, Parikh JR, Arleo EK, Bluth E. The radiologist and depression. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(7):863–867. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.03.014
  27. Bianchi R, Schonfeld IS, Laurent E. Burnout–depression overlap: A review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015;36:28–41. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.004
  28. Preciado Serrano MdL, Pozos-Radillo E, Colunga-Rodríguez C, Vázquez-Goñi JM, Ávalos-Latorre ML. Relationship between psycho­social factors, work emotional exhaustion and burnout in Mexican dentists [in Spanish]. Univ Psychol. 2017;16(2):1–11. doi:10.11144/Javeriana.upsy16-2.refp
  29. Harolds JA, Parikh JR, Bluth EI, Dutton SC, Recht MP. Burnout of radio­logists: Frequency, risk factors, and remedies: A report of the ACR Commission on Human Resources. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(4):411–416. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2015.11.003
  30. Lozano E. Level of work stress in medical technologists in radiology of the emergency service of the hospitals Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Alberto Sabogal Sologuren and Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen, Lima – Peru, May–August 2016 [in Spanish] (thesis for the Degree of Bachelor of Medical Technology in the area of Radiology). Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM), Lima, Peru. 2017.
  31. Cubas A. Radiology student burnout at the Professional School of Medical Technology at Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, 2017 [in Spanish] (thesis for the Degree of Bachelor of Medical Technology in the area of Radiology). Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM), Lima, Peru. 2018. https://cybertesis.unmsm.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12672/7841/Cubas_la.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed December 4, 2020.
  32. Zha N, Patlas MN, Neuheimer N, Duszak R, Jr. Prevalence of burnout among Canadian radiologists and radiology trainees. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018;69(4):367–372. doi:10.1016/j.carj.2018.05.005
  33. Ferguson C, Low G, Shiau G. Burnout in Canadian radiology residency: A national assessment of prevalence and under­lying contributory factors. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2020;71(1):40–47. doi:10.1177/0846537119885672
  34. Kawthalkar AS, Sequeira RA, Arya S, Baheti AD. Non‑radiation occupational hazards and health issues faced by radiologists – a cross‑sectional study of Indian radiologists. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2019;29(1):61–66. doi:10.4103/ijri.IJRI_403_18
  35. Chawla A, Lim TC, Shikhare SN. Computer vision syndrome: Darkness under the shadow of light. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2019;70(1):5–9. doi:10.1016/j.carj.2018.10.005
  36. Teo C, Giffard P, Johnston V, Treleaven J. Computer vision symptoms in people with and without neck pain. Appl Ergon. 2019;80:50–56. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2019.04.010
  37. Atwal SS, Prasad A, Deepak D, Agarwal K. Health issues among radiologists: Toll they pay to their profession. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(4):TM01–TM02. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2017/17023.9537
  38. Ranasinghe P, Wathurapatha WS, Perera YS, et al. Computer vision syndrome among computer office workers in a developing country: An evaluation of prevalence and risk factors. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:150. doi:10.1186/s13104-016-1962-1
  39. Magnavita N, Fileni A. Work stress and metabolic syndrome in radiologists: First evidence. Radiol Med. 2013;119(2):142–148. doi:10.1007/s11547-013-0329-0
  40. Chingarande G, Bungu T, Mukwasi C, et al. The prevalence and severity of the symptoms of darkroom disease among darkroom technicians in Harare, Zimbabwe. World J Medical Sci. 2013;8(2):113–117. doi:10.5829/idosi.wjms.2013.8.2.7319
  41. Mulimani P, Hoe VC, Hayes MJ, Idiculla JJ, Abas AB, Karanth L. Ergonomic interventions for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in dental care practitioners. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;10(10):CD01126. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011261.pub2
  42. Ratwani RM, Wang E, Fong A. A human factors approach to understanding the types and sources of interruptions in radiology reading rooms. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(9):1102–1105. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.02.017
  43. García-Lallana A, Viteri-Ramírez G, Saiz Mendiguren R, Broncano J, Dámaso Aqueretta J. Ergonomics of the workplace in radiology [in Spanish]. Radiology. 2011;53(6):507–515. doi:10.1016/j.rx.2011.06.007
  44. Kallio-Pulkinnen S, Huumonen S, Haapea M, et al. Effect of display type, DICOM calibration and room illuminance in bitewing radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(1):20150129. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20150129
  45. Randolph SA. Computer vision syndrome. Workplace Health Saf. 2017;65(7):328. doi:10.1177/2165079917712727
  46. Munshi S, Varghese A, Dhar-Munshi S. Computer vision syndrome – a common cause of unexplained visual symptoms in the modern era. Int J Clin Pract. 2017;71(7). doi:10.1111/ijcp.12962
  47. Dessie A, Adane F, Nega A, Wami SD, Chercos DH. Computer vision syndrome and associated factors among computer users in Debre Tabor town, northwest Ethiopia. J Environ Public Health. 2018;2018:4107590. doi:10.1155/2018/4107590
  48. Stec N, Arje D, Moody AR, Krupinski EA, Tyrrell PN. A systematic review of fatigue in radiology: Is it a problem? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(4):799–806. doi:10.2214/AJR.17.18613
  49. Taylor-Phillips S, Stinton C. Fatigue in radiology: A fertile area for future research. Br J Radiol. 2019;92(1099):20190043. doi:10.1259/bjr.20190043
  50. van Niekerk SM, Louw QA, Hillier S. The effectiveness of a chair intervention in the workplace to reduce musculoskeletal symptoms. A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:145. doi:10.1186 / 1471-2474-13-145
  51. Curran M, O’Sullivan L, O’Sullivan P, Dankaerts W, O’Sullivan K. Does using a chair backrest or reducing seated hip flexion influence trunk muscle activity and discomfort? A systematic review. Hum Factors. 2015;57(7):1115–1148. doi:10.1177/0018720815591905
  52. Wolkoff P. Indoor air humidity, air quality, and health – an overview. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018;221(3):376–390. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.01.015
  53. Davis RE, McGregor GR, Enfield KB. Humidity: A review and primer on atmospheric moisture and human health. Environ Res. 2016;144(Pt A):106–116. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2015.10.014
  54. Xyrichis A, Wynne J, Mackrill J, Rafferty M, Carlyle A. Noise pollution in hospitals. BMJ. 2018;363:k4808. doi:10.1136/bmj.k4808
  55. Lusk SL, McCullagh M, Dickson VV, Xu J. Position statement: Harmful effects of environmental noise exposures. Nurs Outlook. 2016;64(4):395–396. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2016.06.001
  56. Lusk SL, McCullagh M, Dickson VV, Xu J. Reduce noise: Improve the nation’s health. Nurs Outlook. 2017;65(5):652–656. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2017.08.001
  57. Odell D, Johnson P. Evaluation of flat, angled, and vertical computer mice and their effects on wrist posture, pointing performance, and preference. Work. 2015;52(2):245–253. doi:10.3233/WOR-152167
  58. Kia K, Sisley J, Johnson PW, Kim JH. Differences in typing forces, muscle activity, wrist posture, typing performance, and self-reported comfort among conventional and ultra-low travel keyboards. Appl Ergon. 2019;74:10–16. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2018.07.014
  59. Bluth EI, Bender CE, Parikh JR. Burnout: Redesign the work process rather than the person. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(10):1375–1376. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.05.004
  60. Ayala-Álvarez RI, Fiori Chíncaro G. Review of the main radiation protection standards for the use of X-ray equipment in dentistry. Literature review [in Spanish]. Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2019;7(2):119–133. doi:10.21142/2523-2754-0702-2019-119-133