Dental and Medical Problems

Dent Med Probl
Index Copernicus (ICV 2020) – 128.41
MEiN – 70 pts
CiteScore (2021) – 2.0
JCI – 0.5
Average rejection rate (2021) – 81.35%
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – quarterly

Download original text (EN)

Dental and Medical Problems

2019, vol. 56, nr 4, October-December, p. 343–348

doi: 10.17219/dmp/111697

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Effect of etching the coronal dentin with the rubbing technique on the microtensile bond strength of a universal adhesive system

Wpływ wytrawiania zębiny koronowej techniką wcierania na mikrorozciągliwą siłę wiązania uniwersalnego systemu adhezyjnego

Naji Kharouf1,2,A,B,C,D,F, Gautier Rapp2,B,C, Davide Mancino1,2,E,F, Joseph Hemmerlé1,C,E,F, Youssef Haikel1,2,E,F, Francois Reitzer1,2,A,C,E,F

1 Inserm UMR_S 1121, Biomaterials and Bioengineering, University of Strasbourg, France

2 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Strasbourg, France

Abstract

Background. The adhesion of composite resins to the dentin substrate is influenced by the treatment of the smear layer. While etch-and-rinse systems require dentin to be conditioned with phosphoric acid, self-etching systems preserve the smear layer by incorporating it into the adhesive layer.
Objectives. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of etching with the rubbing technique on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a universal adhesive to dentin.
Material and Methods. Eighteen extracted teeth were selected. Two etch-and-rinse techniques (with and without rubbing) and a self-etching technique were used to bond the dentin surfaces with a universal adhesive system. After 24 h, the bonded samples were prepared for the μTBS testing. The specimens were loaded with a tensile force at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) analyses were used to reveal the failure modes. The data were statistically analyzed with the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and χ2 tests.
Results. The etch-and-rinse system with rubbing produced significantly lower bond strength (42.11 ±9.26 MPa,) than the etch-and-rinse system without rubbing (47.30 ±8.12 MPa) and significantly higher bond strength than the self-etching system (38.07 ±9.49 MPa).
Conclusion. Under the conditions of this study, dentin etched with phosphoric acid for 3 s in the etchandrinse mode with the rubbing technique for a universal adhesive system decreases the μTBS of the composite to dentin.

Key words

etching, phosphoric acid, universal adhesive, rubbing technique

Słowa kluczowe

wytrawianie, kwas fosforowy, uniwersalny materiał adhezyjny, technika wcierania

References (34)

  1. Goldberg M, Kulkarni AB, Young M, Boskey A. Dentin: Structure, composition and mineralization. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2011;3:711–735.
  2. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: A review. Dent Mater. 1995;11(2):117–125.
  3. Brännström M, Glantz PO, Nordenvall KJ. The effect of some cleaning solutions on the morphology of dentin prepared in different ways: An in-vivo study. ASDC J Dent Child. 1979;46(4):291–295.
  4. Ikeda T, De Munck J, Shirai K, et al. Effect of air-drying and solvent evaporation on the strength of HEMA-rich versus HEMA-free one-step adhesives. Dent Mater. 2008;24(10):1316–1323.
  5. Grégoire G, Ahmed Y. Evaluation of the enamel etching capacity of six contemporary self-etching adhesives. J Dent. 2007;35(5):388–397.
  6. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):17–28.
  7. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):1–16.
  8. Li B, Zhu X, Ma L, et al. Selective demineralisation of dentine extrafibrillar minerals – a potential method to eliminate water-wet bonding in the etch-and-rinse technique. J Dent. 2016;52:55–62.
  9. Bertassoni LE, Orgel JPR, Antipova O, Swain MV. The dentin organic matrix – limitations of restorative dentistry hidden on the nanometer scale. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(7):2419–2433.
  10. Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine – Old wine in new bottles? J Dent. 2015;43(5):525–536.
  11. Koshiro K, Inoue S, Tanaka T, et al. In vivo degradation of resin–dentin bonds produced by a self-etch vs. a total-etch adhesive system. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112(4):368–375.
  12. Abu-Hanna A, Gordan VV, Mjor I. The effect of variation in etching times on dentin bonding. Gen Dent. 2004;52(1):28–33.
  13. Stape THS, Wik P, Mutluay MM, Al-Ani AAS, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. Selective dentin etching: A potential method to improve bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;86:14–22.
  14. Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Mutluay M, Seseogullari-Dirihan R, et al. Effect of phosphoric acid on the degradation of human dentin matrix. J Dent Res. 2013;92(1):87–91.
  15. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’ adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2012;40(6):475–484.
  16. Zecin-Deren A, Sokolowski J, Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Piwonski I, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Lapinska B. Multi-layer application of self-etch and universal adhesives and the effect on dentin bond strength. Molecules. 2019;24(2).pii:E345.
  17. Yeşilyurt C, Bulucu B. Bond strength of total-etch and self-etch dentin adhesive systems on peripheral and central dentinal tissue: A microtensile bond strength test. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006;7(2):26–36.
  18. Ozer F, Unlü N, Sengun A. Influence of dentinal regions on bond strengths of different adhesive systems. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(6):659–663.
  19. Jang JH, Lee MG, Woo SU, Lee CO, Yi JK, Kim DS. Comparative study of the dentin bond strength of a new universal adhesive. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(4):606–612.
  20. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014;42(7):800–807.
  21. Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: A critical literature review. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e78–e93.
  22. Resin–dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods. J Dent. 2007;35(6):467–475.
  23. Reis A, Carrilho M, Breschi L, Loguercio AD. Overview of clinical alternatives to minimize the degradation of the resin–dentin bonds. Oper Dent. 2013;38(4):E1–E25.
  24. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, Kaga M, Oguchi H. In vitro degra­dation of resin–dentin bonds analyzed by microtensile bond test, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Biomaterials. 2003;24(21):3795–3803.
  25. Bahillo J, Roig M, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Self-etching aspects of a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(8):1893–1900.
  26. Perdigao J, Swift EJ. Analysis of dental adhesive systems using scanning electron microscopy. Int Dent J. 1994;44(4):349–359.
  27. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, et al. Over-etching effects on micro-tensile bond strength and failure patterns for two dentin bonding systems. J Dent. 2002;30(2–3):99–105.
  28. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215–235.
  29. Van Landuyt KL, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, et al. Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. J Dent Res. 2008;87(8):757–761.
  30. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, et al. Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces for hard tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(9):3573–3582.
  31. Zhang Z, Wang X, Zhang L, et al. The contribution of chemical bonding to the short- and long-term enamel bond strengths. Dent Mater. 2013;29(7):e103–e112.
  32. Wang Y, Spencer P. Effect of acid etching time and technique on interfacial characteristics of the adhesive–dentin bond using differential staining. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112(3):293–299.
  33. Sadek FT, Goracci C, Cardoso PE, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength of current dentin adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7(4):297–302.
  34. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, et al. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2016;32(2):e9–e21.