Dental and Medical Problems

Dent Med Probl
Index Copernicus (ICV 2020) – 128.41
MEiN – 70 pts
CiteScore (2021) – 2.0
JCI – 0.5
Average rejection rate (2021) – 81.35%
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – quarterly

Download PDF

Dental and Medical Problems

2018, vol. 55, nr 2, April-June, p. 207–211

doi: 10.17219/dmp/90729

Publication type: review article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Porcelain veneers: An update

Licówki porcelanowe – uaktualnienie wiedzy

Omar El-Mowafy1,A,C,D,F, Nihal El-Aawar1,B, Nora El-Mowafy2,E

1 Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Canada

2 Department of Oral Health Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada


New glass-ceramic restorative materials have been developed over the last few years, with enhanced strength characteristics along with desirable optical properties that make them ideal for the fabrication of esthetic crowns and veneers. The purpose of this paper was to provide an overview of the current state of the art of porcelain veneers as a viable option for the esthetic treatment of anterior teeth, and to illustrate the potential of the newly-developed glass-ceramics. Some historical background about the development of the porcelain veneer concept is provided. A list of indications and contraindications for porcelain veneers is followed by their preparation designs, with emphasis on the importance of maintaining the preparation boundaries within the enamel. Impression-taking procedures, provisional restoration fabrication, the choice of porcelain materials and their intaglio surface treatment are all discussed. A case where veneers made with a lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic were used to improve the appearance of maxillary anterior teeth is included. Several studies reporting on the longevity of porcelain veneers up to 12 years are discussed.

Key words

glass-ceramic, update, dental porcelain, longevity

Słowa kluczowe

tworzywo szklano-ceramiczne, uaktualnienie wiedzy, ceramika dentystyczna, trwałość

References (49)

  1. The glossary of prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:E70.
  2. Burke FJ. Survival rate for porcelain laminate veneers with special references to the effect of preparation in dentin: A literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;24:257–265.
  3. Aykor A, Ozel E. Five-year clinical evaluation of 300 teeth restored with porcelain laminate veneers using total-etch and a modified self-etch adhesive system. Oper Dent. 2009;34:516–523.
  4. Goldstein RE. Esthetics in Dentistry. Vol. 1. Principles, Communications, Treatment Methods. 2nd ed. Hamilton, Canada: BC Decker Inc.; 1998:14.
  5. Calamia JR. Etched porcelain facial veneers: A new treatment modality based on scientific and clinical evidence. NY J Dent. 1983;53:255–259.
  6. Calamia JR. Etched porcelain veneers: The current state of the art. Quintessence Int. 1985;16:5–12.
  7. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;34:849–853.
  8. Bowen RL. Properties of a silica-reinforced polymer for dental restoration. J Am Dent Assoc. 1963;66:57–64.
  9. Addison O, Marquis PM, Fleming GJ. Adhesive luting of all-ceramic restorations: The impact of cementation variables and short-term water storage on the strength of a feldspathic dental ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10:285–293.
  10. Jankar AS, Kale Y, Kangane S, Ambekar A, Sinha M, Chaware S. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of ceramic veneer with three different incisal design preparations: An in vitro study. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6:48–54.
  11. Horn HR. Porcelain laminate veneer bonded to etched enamel: A review. Dent Clin North Am. 1983;27:671–684.
  12. Strassler HE. Minimally invasive porcelain veneer: Indications for a conservative esthetic dentistry treatment modality. Gen Dent. 2007;55:686–712.
  13. Cehreli MC, Iplikçioglu H. Five-year follow-up of InCeram laminate restorations: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84:487–489.
  14. Freire A, Archegas LR. Porcelain laminate veneer on a highly discolored tooth: A case report. J Can Dent Assoc. 2010;76:a126.
  15. Walls AWG. The use of adhesively retained all-porcelain veneers during the management of fractured and worn anterior teeth. Part 2. Clinical result after five-years follow-up. Br Dent J. 1995;178:337–340.
  16. Peumans M, Van Meerbeeck B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Five-year clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Quintessence Int. 1998;29:211–221.
  17. Magne P, Perroud R, Hodges JS, Belser UC. Clinical performance of novel-design porcelain veneers for the recovery of coronal volume and length. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000;20:440–457.
  18. Chen W, Raigrodski AJ. A conservative approach for treating young adult patients with porcelain laminate veneers. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20:223–238.
  19. Pippin DJ, Mixson JM, Soldan-Els AP. Clinical evaluation of restored maxillary incisors: Veneers vs PFM crowns. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995;126:1523–1529.
  20. Kumar Vinod G, Soorya Poduval T, Reddy B, Shesha Reddy P. A study on provisional cements, cementation techniques, and their effects on bonding of porcelain laminate veneers. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014;14:42–49.
  21. Taskonak B, Anusavice K, Mecholsky J. Role of investment interaction layer on strength and toughness of ceramic laminates. Dent Mater. 2004;20:701–708.
  22. Shuman IE. Esthetic treatment with a pressed ceramic veneer material: Case reports. Dent Today. 2004;23:80–84.
  23. Mormann WH. The evolution of CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(Suppl):7S–13S.
  24. Vafiadis D, Goldstein G. Single visit fabrication of a porcelain laminate veneer with CAD/CAM technology: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106:71–74.
  25. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1460–1465.
  26. Kursoglu P, Motro PFK, Yurdaguven H. Shear bond strength of resin cement to an acid etched and a laser irradiated ceramic surface. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5:98–103.
  27. Valian A, Moravej-Salehi E. Surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: Scanning electron microscopy analysis. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6:387–394.
  28. Aida M, Hayakawa T, Mizukawa K. Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:464–470.
  29. Kato H, Matsumura H, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Bond strength and durability of porcelain bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:163–168.
  30. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin–ceramic bonding: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:268–274.
  31. Meshramkar R, Sajjan S. A comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of porcelain and composite using different bonding agents: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010;10(1):36–40.
  32. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Kolbeck C, Handel G. Marginal integrity of CAD/CAM fixed partial dentures. Eur J Dent. 2007;1:25–30.
  33. Touati B, Miara P. Light transmission in bonded ceramic restorations. J Esthet Dent. 1993;5:11–18.
  34. Cantoro A, Goracci C, Coniglio I, Magni E, Polimeni A, Ferrari M. Influence of ultra-sound application on inlay luting with self-adhesive resin cements. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15:617–623.
  35. Judge RB, Wilson PR. The effect of oscillating forces upon the flow of dental cements. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:892–899.
  36. Schmidlin PR, Zehnder M, Schup-Mityko C, Gohring TN. Interface evaluation after manual and ultrasonic insertion of standardized class I inlays using composite resin materials of different viscosity. Acta Odontol Scand. 2005;63:205–212.
  37. Peutzfelt A. Effect of the ultrasonic insertion technique on the seating of composite inlays. Acta Odontol Scand. 1994;52:51–54.
  38. Reeves WG. Restorative margin placement and periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:7333–7336.
  39. Shuman IE. Esthetic treatment with a pressed ceramic veneer material: Case reports. Dent Today. 2004;23:80–84.
  40. Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation. A retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25:9–17.
  41. Della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(Suppl):8–13.
  42. D’Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, Vadini M, D’Amario M. Clinical evaluation on porcelain laminate veneers bonded with light-cured composite: Results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:1071–1079.
  43. Gurel G, Sesma N, Calamita MA, et al. Influence of enamel preservation on failure rates of porcelain laminate veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33:31–39.
  44. Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, Dumfahrt H. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers for up to 20 years. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25:79–85.
  45. Layton D, Walton T. An up to 16-year prospective study of 304 porcelain veneers. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20:389–396.
  46. Friedman MJ. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure: A clinician’s observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998;19:625–636.
  47. Peumans M, De Munck J, Fieuws S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Van Meerbeek B. A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. J Adhes Dent. 2004;6:65–76.
  48. Morimoto S, Albanesi RB, Sesma N, Agra CM, Braga MM. Main clinical outcomes of feldspathic porcelain and glass-ceramic laminate veneers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of survival complication rates. Int J Prosth. 2016;29:38–47.
  49. Calamia JR, Calamia CS. Porcelain laminate veneers: Reasons for 25 years of success. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51:399–417.