Dental and Medical Problems

Dent Med Probl
Index Copernicus (ICV 2020) – 128.41
MEiN – 70 pts
CiteScore (2021) – 2.0
JCI – 0.5
Average rejection rate (2021) – 81.35%
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – quarterly

Download PDF

Dental and Medical Problems

2018, vol. 55, nr 2, April-June, p. 179–183

doi: 10.17219/dmp/85878

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Use of the Explicit Health Guarantee of Oral Health Care for Pregnant Women at a Family Health Center, Concepción, Chile, 2014–2015

Zastosowanie Programu Gwarancji dla Zdrowia Jamy Ustnej w Opiece nad Kobietą w Ciąży w Rodzinnym Centrum Zdrowia w Concepción, Chile, w latach 2014–2015

Jetzabell Oliva1,A,B,C,D,F, Mariajosé Olivares1,A,B,C,D,F, Ricardo Cartes-Velásquez2,3,A,C,D,E,F, Luis Luengo1,B,C,E,F, Valeria Campos1,A,C,D,E,F

1 School of Dentistry, Universidad de Concepción, Chile

2 School of Dentistry, Universidad Andres Bello, Concepción, Chile

3 School of Health Sciences, Universidad Autonoma de Chile, Santiago, Chile

Abstract

Background. Oral health plays a crucial role in general health, quality of life and well-being of pregnant women and their newborns. In Chile, pregnant women have dental care guaranteed by law. However, due to the lack of previous epidemiological studies on the benefits of this guarantee, it is necessary to describe this situation and evaluate the need to change the methods of providing dental services.
Objectives. The objective of this study was to describe the pattern of providing dental benefits resulting from the Explicit Health Guarantee – Integral Oral Health in Pregnant Women (GES-SOIE) program to pregnant women attending the Juan Soto Fernández Family Health Center, Concepción, Chile, in 2014–2015.
Material and Methods. A cross-sectional study of the electronic dental records of patients admitted to GES-SOIE was conducted. The variables studied were sociodemographic data, dental chair hours, non-attendance, treatment completion, and the type of referral to secondary healthcare (SHC).
Results. Of 233 pregnant women, 65.2% were registered for non-attendance, 21.2% required referral to SHC and 76.4% completed their treatment. When performing logistic regression, it was found that for each non-attendance the chance of not completing the treatment increased 1.4 times.
Conclusion. The level of non-attendance and opting out of the treatment in pregnant women is high, which hinders the proper functioning and effectiveness of GES-SOIE.

Key words

pregnant women, dental care, dental health services

Słowa kluczowe

kobiety w ciąży, opieka dentystyczna, świadczenia dentystyczne

References (20)

  1. American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Guideline on perinatal oral health care. Pediatr Dent. 2011;32:109–113.
  2. Shahnazi H, Hosseintalaei M, Ghashghaei FE, Charkazi A, Yahyavi Y, Sharifirad G. Effect of educational intervention on perceived susceptibility self-efficacy and DMFT of pregnant women. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016;18:e24960. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.24960
  3. Zhong C, Ma KN, Wong YS, So Y, Lee PC, Yang Y. Oral health knowledge of pregnant women on pregnancy gingivitis and children’s oral health. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;39:105–108.
  4. Gümüs P, Öztürk VÖ, Bozkurt E, Emingil G. Evaluation of the gingival inflammation in pregnancy and postpartum via 25-hydroxy-vitamin D3, prostaglandin E2 and TNF-α levels in saliva. Arch Oral Biol. 2016;63:1–6.
  5. Usin MM, Tabares SM, Parodi RJ, Sembaj A. Periodontal conditions during the pregnancy associated with periodontal pathogens. J Investig Clin Dent. 2013;4:54–59.
  6. Wu M, Chen SW, Jiang SY. Relationship between gingival inflammation and pregnancy. Mediators Inflamm. 2015:623427.
  7. Norambuena-Suazo P, Palma-Cárdenas I. Periodontal treatment needs in pregnant women, Frutillar, Chile, 2015 [in Spanish]. Rev Clínica Periodoncia, Implantol. y Rehabil Oral. 2016;9:121–124.
  8. Kamate WI, Vibhute NA, Baad RK. Estimation of DMFT, salivary Streptococcus mutans count, flow rate, pH, and salivary total calcium content in pregnant and non-pregnant women: A prospective study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:ZC147–ZC151.
  9. Saluja P, Shetty V, Dave A, Arora M, Hans V, Madan A. Comparative evaluation of the effect of menstruation, pregnancy and menopause on salivary flow rate, pH and gustatory function. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:ZC81–ZC85.
  10. Vergnes JN, Kaminski M, Lelong N, Musset AM, Sixou M, Nabet C. Frequency and risk indicators of tooth decay among pregnant women in France: A cross-sectional analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033296
  11. Ministry of Health of Chile. Guía Clínica Salud Oral Integral de la Embarazada. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de Salud (MINSAL); 2013.
  12. Laurell AC, Ronquillo JH. The Second Health Reform. Insurance and payer-provider split [in Spanish]. Salud Col 2010;6:137–148.
  13. Núñez J, Moya P, Monsalves MJ, Landaeta S. Oral health level of knowledge and use of dental GES in puerperal patients at a private clinic, Santiago, Chile. IInt J Odontostomatol. 2013;7:39–46.
  14. Fuentes Fernández R, Oporto Venegas G, Alarcón AM, Bustos Medina L, Prieto Gómez R, Rico Williams H. Opinion and beliefs of pregnancy women in prenatal control related to oral health and pregnant [in Spanish]. Av Odontoestomatol. 2009;25:147–154.
  15. Saddki N, Yusoff A, Hwang YL. Factors associated with dental visit and barriers to utilization of oral health care services in a sample of antenatal mothers in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-75
  16. Cruz G, Núñez G, Salinas A, Ramos E, Sánchez R. Factors associated with the use of dental health services in primary care in northeastern Mexico. J Oral Res. 2016;5:240–247.
  17. Dinas K, Achyropoulos V, Hatzipantelis E, et al. Pregnancy and oral health: Utilization of dental services during pregnancy in northern Greece. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:938–944.
  18. Martínez-Delgado CM. Some considerations on the Latin American oral health literacy. J Oral Res. 2016;5:59–60.
  19. Le M, Riedy C, Weinstein P, Milgrom P. Barriers to utilization of dental services during pregnancy: A qualitative analysis. J Dent Child (Chic). 2009;76:46–52.
  20. Cantarutti C, Veliz C, Madariaga P, et al. What are the barriers to access to dental care for pregnant women? A review of the literature [in Spanish]. Ars Medica Rev Ciencias Méd. 2017;42:50–54.