Dental and Medical Problems

Dent Med Probl
Index Copernicus (ICV 2020) – 128.41
MEiN – 70 pts
CiteScore (2021) – 2.0
JCI – 0.5
Average rejection rate (2021) – 81.35%
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – quarterly

Download PDF

Dental and Medical Problems

2018, vol. 55, nr 2, April-June, p. 173–177

doi: 10.17219/dmp/89646

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Factors associated with insufficient removable partial denture design instructions

Czynniki warunkujące niepełny przepływ informacji między lekarzem stomatologiem a technikiem podczas projektowania ruchomych częściowych uzupełnień protetycznych

Nuran Özyemişci Cebeci1,A,B,C,D,E,F

1 Dental Prosthesis Technology Program, Vocational School of Health Services, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey


Background. The design of removable partial denture (RPD) has an important role in the health of dental and periodontal tissues. Dentists are responsible for the design since designing it requires mechanical and biological considerations. There is lack of literature focusing on the behavior of dentists in Turkey concerning the design of RPDs.
Objectives. This study aimed to assess the capability of dentists to transfer RPD design information to dental laboratories, and to determine the factors playing a role in the designing or transferring the design information.
Material and Methods. A questionnaire was distributed to 25 dental laboratories in all geographical regions of Turkey. Design instructions of RPD provided by dentists using a prescription form, phone call and internet were examined. Clinic type, communication method, way of showing design information, and specialization in prosthodontics were recorded to investigate their association with design information. The data was analyzed with descriptive statistics and χ2 test.
Results. Approximately 2/3 of the dentists did not mention any design information in the instructions. Laboratory prescription form was the most frequently used communication method. Design features were mostly indicated in diagrams. The ratio of indicating design information was higher among prosthodontists. Over a half of the dentists who mentioned design information in their instructions were from private dental clinics. The dentists who preferred both writing and drawing for showing design specifications had the highest ratio of showing rest type, clasp location and rest location in their instructions.
Conclusion. The majority of dentists do not mention any design information. Expertise in prosthodontics and type of dental institution affect the content of the design information. Showing design features in more than 1 way seems to increase the amount of design items. Training dentists in aspects of RPD design and evaluating the circumstances of clinics is essential.

Key words

removable partial denture, denture design, dental laboratory

Słowa kluczowe

ruchome częściowe uzupełnienie protetyczne, projekt protezy, laboratorium dentystyczne

References (23)

  1. Kilfeather GP, Lynch CD, Sloan AJ, Youngson CC. Quality of communication and master impressions for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in general dental practice in England, Ireland and Wales in 2009. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:300–305.
  2. Itoh H, Baba K, Aridome K, et al. Effect of direct retainer and major connector designs on RPD and abutment tooth movement dynamics. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:810–815.
  3. Preshaw PM, Walls AW, Jakubovics NS, Moynihan PJ, Jepson NJ, Loewy Z. Association of removable partial denture use with oral and systemic health. J Dent. 2011;39:711–719.
  4. Aoda K, Shimamura I, Tahara Y, Sakurai K. Retainer design for unilateral extension base partial removable dental prosthesis by three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2010;54:84–91.
  5. Carr AB, Brown DT. McCracken’s Removable Partial Prosthodontics. 12th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby; 2011:119,284,287.
  6. Dula LJ, Ahmedi EF, Lila-Krasniqi ZD, Shala KSh. Clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures on the periodontal health of abutment teeth: A retrospective study. Open Dent J. 2015;9:132–139.
  7. Lynch CD, Allen PF. Quality of communication between dental practitioners and dental technicians for fixed prosthodontics in Ireland. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:901–905.
  8. Haj-Ali R, Al Quran F, Adel O. Dental laboratory communication regarding removable dental prosthesis design in the UAE. J Prosthodont. 2012;21:425–428.
  9. Berry J, Nesbit M, Saberi S, Petridis H. Communication methods and production techniques in fixed prosthesis fabrication: A UK based survey. Part 1: Communication methods. Br Dent J. 2014;217(6):E12.
  10. Al Shiddi IF. Communication between dental office and dental laboratory: From paper-based to web-based. Pak Oral Dental J. 2014;34:555–559.
  11. Alabduljabbar R, El-Masri S. Design of web content management system for dental laboratories. IJCSI. 2013;10:82–89.
  12. Lynch CD, Allen PF. Quality of written prescriptions and master impressions for fixed and removable prosthodontics: A comparative study. Br Dent J. 2005;198:17–20.
  13. Radhi A, Lynch CD, Hannigan A. Quality of written communication and master impressions for fabrication of removable partial prostheses in the Kingdom of Bahrain. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34:153–157.
  14. Afsharzand Z, Rashedi B, Petropoulos VC. Dentist communication with the dental laboratory for prosthodontic treatment using implants. J Prosthodont. 2006;15:202–207.
  15. Afsharzand Z, Rashedi B, Petropoulos VC. Communication between the dental laboratory technician and dentist: Work authorization for fixed partial dentures. J Prosthodont. 2006;15:123–128.
  16. Stewart CA. An audit of dental prescriptions between clinics and dental laboratories. Br Dent J. 2011;211(3):E5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.623
  17. Parry GR, Evans JL, Cameron A. Communicating prosthetic prescriptions from dental students to the dental laboratory: Is the message getting through? J Dent Educ. 2014;78:1636–1642.
  18. Dickie J, Shearer AC, Ricketts DN. Audit to assess the quality of communication between operators and technicians in a fixed prosthodontic laboratory: Educational and training implications. Eur J Dent Educ. 2014;18:7–14.
  19. Sui L, Wu X, Wu S, Gao P, Li R. The quality of written instructions for dental prostheses in China. J Prosthodont. 2014;23:602–609.
  20. Carneiro LC. Specifications provided by practitioners for fabrication of removable acrylic prostheses in Tanzania. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:660–665.
  21. Etman MK, Bikey D. Clinical performance of removable partial dentures: A retrospective clinical study. OJST. 2012;2:173–181.
  22. Lynch CD. Successful removable partial dentures. Dent Update. 2012;39:118–120,122–126.
  23. Pun DK, Waliszewski MP, Waliszewski KJ, Berzins D. Survey of partial removable dental prosthesis (partial RDP) types in a distinct patient population. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106:48–56.