Dental and Medical Problems

Dent Med Probl
Index Copernicus (ICV 2021) – 132.50
MEiN – 70 pts
CiteScore (2021) – 2.0
JCI (2021) – 0.5
Average rejection rate (2022) – 79.69%
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – quarterly

Download PDF

Dental and Medical Problems

2018, vol. 55, nr 2, April-June, p. 133–138

doi: 10.17219/dmp/85709

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Effect of Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation on dentine debris removal from different parts of the root canal system: An in vitro study

Wpływ lasera Er:YAG aktywującego przepłukiwanie na usuwanie zębiny z różnych części kanału korzeniowego – badania in vitro

Rami Zen Aldeen1,A,B,C,D, Ossama Aljabban1,A,F, Hussam Milly1,C,D, Amro Allouch1,B,D, Omar Hamadah1,A,E,F

1 Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Syria


Background. There is insufficient information available in the literature about the efficacy of laser-activated irrigation (LAI) in removing dentine debris at different coronal-apical levels of the root canal system (RCS).
Objectives. To evaluate the efficacy of erbium (LAI) in removing dentine debris from different coronal-apical levels of the RCS when compared to passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and conventional irrigation (CI).
Material and Methods. Forty-five single-rooted human teeth were split longitudinally into halves. In each sample, a standardized groove was cut 2–6 mm from the apex along the canal wall of the 1st half, and another standardized groove was cut 10–14 mm from the apex along the canal wall of the 2nd half. Each groove was filled with dentine debris mixed with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) 5.25%. The samples were assigned to 3 experimental groups according to the irrigant activation techniques (n = 15); (a) CI group, (b) PUI group and (c) LAI group. The amount of the remaining dentine debris was identified and scored using a stereomicroscope.
Results. Laser-activated irrigation removed significantly more debris than PUI and CI systems. The efficacy of dentine debris removal was not affected by the root canal third within all groups.
Conclusion. Erbium LAI enhances dentine debris removal from the artificial irregularities in the RCS.

Key words

conventional irrigation, dentine debris removal, laser-activated irrigation, passive ultrasonic irrigation, root canal system

Słowa kluczowe

konwencjonalna irygacja, usuwanie zębiny, irygacja aktywowana wiązką laserową, pasywna irygacja za pomocą ultradźwięków, system kanału korzeniowego

References (30)

  1. Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil JM. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endod Topics. 2005;10:77–102.
  2. Gutarts R, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M. In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod. 2005;31:166–170.
  3. Huang TY, Gulabivala K, Ng YL. A biomolecular film ex vivo model to evaluate the influence of canal dimensions and irrigation variables on the efficacy of irrigation. Int Endod J. 2008;41:60–71.
  4. Lee SJ, Wu MK, Wesselink P. The effectiveness of syringe irrigation and ultrasonics to remove debris from simulated irregularities within prepared root canal walls. Int Endod J. 2004;37:672–678.
  5. Gu L-S, Kim JR, Ling J, et al. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod. 2009;35:791–804.
  6. Van der Sluis LWM, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: A review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2007;40:415–426.
  7. Jiang L-M, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, et al. The influence of the ultrasonic intensity on the cleaning efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation. J Endod. 2011;37:688–692.
  8. Blanken JW, Verdaasdonk RM. Cavitation as a working mechanism of the Er, Cr: YSGG laser in endodontics: A visualization study. JOLA. 2007;7:97–106.
  9. Blanken J, De Moor RJG, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R. Laser-induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 1: A visualization study. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41:514–519.
  10. Matsumoto H, Yoshimine Y, Akamine A. Visualization of irrigant flow and cavitation induced by Er: YAG laser within a root canal model. J Endod. 2011;37:839–843.
  11. De Moor R, Torbeyns D, Meire M. Lasers in endodontics. Part 2: Root canal wall cleanliness and modification. ENDO. 2009;3:19–33.
  12. De Moor RJG, Blanken J, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R. Laser-induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 2: Evaluation of the efficacy. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41:520–523.
  13. De Groot S, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, et al. Laser-activated irrigation within root canals: Cleaning efficacy and flow visualization. Int Endod J. 2009;42:1077–1083.
  14. De Moor RJ, Meire M, Goharkhay K, et al. Efficacy of ultrasonic versus laser-activated irrigation to remove artificially-placed dentin debris plugs. J Endod. 2010;36:1580–1583.
  15. Yamazaki R, Goya C, Yu D-G, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. Effects of erbium, chromium: YSGG laser irradiation on root canal walls: A scanning electron microscopic and thermographic study. J Endod. 2001;27:9–12.
  16. George R, Walsh LJ. Apical extrusion of root canal irrigants when using Er: YAG and Er, Cr: YSGG lasers with optical fibers: An in vitro dye study. J Endod. 2008;34:706–708.
  17. DiVito E, Peters O, Olivi G. Effectiveness of the erbium: YAG laser and new design radial and stripped tips in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation. Lasers Med Sci. 2012;27:273–280.
  18. Peeters HH, Suardita K. Efficacy of smear layer removal at the root tip by using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and erbium, chromium: Yttrium, scandium, gallium garnet laser. J Endod. 2011;37:1585–1589.
  19. Peeters HH, Gutknecht N. Efficacy of laser-driven irrigation versus ultrasonic in removing an airlock from the apical third of a narrow root canal. Aust Endod J. 2014;40:47–53.
  20. Koch JD, Jaramillo DE, DiVito E, Peters OA. Irrigant flow during photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV). Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:381–386.
  21. Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H, et al. Effect of PIPS technique at different power settings on irrigating solution extrusion. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30:1641–1645.
  22. Peeters HH, Mooduto L. Radiographic examination of apical extrusion of root canal irrigants during cavitation induced by Er, Cr: YSGG laser irradiation: An in vivo study. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:2105–2112.
  23. Rödig T, Bozkurt M, Konietschke F, Hülsmann M. Comparison of the vibringe system with syringe and passive ultrasonic irrigation in removing debris from simulated root canal irregularities. J Endod. 2010;36:1410–1413.
  24. van der Sluis LW, Vogels MP, Verhaagen B, et al. Study on the influence of refreshment/activation cycles and irrigants on mechanical cleaning efficiency during ultrasonic activation of the irrigant. J Endod. 2010;36(4):737–740.
  25. Meire MA, Havelaerts S, De Moor RJ. Influence of lasing parameters on the cleaning efficacy of laser-activated irrigation with pulsed erbium lasers. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31:653–658.
  26. Macedo R, Wesselink P, Zaccheo F, et al. Reaction rate of NaOCl in contact with bovine dentine: Effect of activation, exposure time, concentration and pH. Int Endod J. 2010;43:1108–1115.
  27. George R, Meyers IA, Walsh LJ. Laser activation of endodontic irrigants with improved conical laser fiber tips for removing smear layer in the apical third of the root canal. J Endod. 2008;34:1524–1527.
  28. Arslan H, Capar I, Saygili G, et al. Effect of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming on removal of apically placed dentinal debris. Int Endod J. 2014;47:1072–1077.
  29. Arslan H, Akcay M, Capar ID, et al. Efficacy of needle irrigation, EndoActivator, and photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming technique on removal of double and triple antibiotic pastes. J Endod. 2014;40:1439–1442.
  30. De Meyer S, Meire M, Coenye T, De Moor R. Effect of laser-activated irrigation on biofilms in artificial root canals. Int Endod J. 2016;50:472–479.