Dental and Medical Problems

Dent Med Probl
Impact Factor (IF 2023) – 2.7
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI 2023) - 1.06
Scopus CiteScore (2023) – 4.0 (CiteScore Tracker – 4.9)
Index Copernicus (ICV 2023) – 181.00
MNiSW – 70 pts
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – bimonthly


 

Download original text (EN)

Dental and Medical Problems

2017, vol. 54, nr 2, April-June, p. 195–200

doi: 10.17219/dmp/70609

Publication type: review

Language: English

License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

What to do after needlestick injury?

Jakie jest postępowanie po zakłuciu igłą?

Katarzyna Wąsacz1,A,B,C,D,F, Wioletta U. Bereziewicz2,A,B,C,D,F, Jolanta Pytko-Polończyk2,C,E,F, Maria Chomyszyn-Gajewska1,C,E,F

1 Department of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland

2 Integrated Dentistry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland

Abstract

The aim of the study was to raise awareness amongst health care workers (HCW) on blood-borne disease transmission and facilitate the management of stressful situations after injuries contaminated with HIV, HBV, HCV, annually estimated at 2.1 million, 926,000 and 327,000, respectively. The literature was studied to analyze the post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and therapy for dental staff (dentist, dental hygienist, dental nurse and other HCW taking responsibility for the decontamination of instruments). The analysis included the following elements: first steps after injury at a dental office, referring to a qualified physician, laboratory testing according to HCW’s and patient’s immunological status, beginning of treatment regimen, time and types of follow-up examinations. PEP should be started immediately after needlestick injury and consist of: cleansing the injured site with soap and water, administering first aid, laboratory testing of the affected HCW and the source patient, referring the HCW to a physician experienced with infectious disease control and follow up examinations. If the physician decides that the risk for HIV exposure is high, the regimen of antiretroviral medications begins within 2 h after the incident. Deep injuries and injuries with visible blood increase the risk of transmission. The primary way to prevent the transmission of blood-borne pathogens is to avoid occupational blood exposure by staying focused during the procedures and using preventive measures. PEP would be much more effective if every medical office had written guidelines covering the prevention and management of needlestick injuries and the dental staff periodically attended educational seminars and training.

Key words

HIV, HBV, healthcare workers, needlestick injury, post-exposure prophylaxis

Słowa kluczowe

HIV, HBV, pracownicy służby zdrowia, zakłucie igłą, profilaktyka poekspozycyjna

References (30)

  1. CDC: Updated U.S. Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to HBV, HCV, and HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. Mortal Morb Wkly Rep. 2001;50:3–5.
  2. CDC: Updated U.S. Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational exposures to HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. MMWR. 2005;54:1–17.
  3. Samaranayake L, Scully C. Needlestick and occupational exposure to infections: a compendium of current guidelines. Br Dent J. 2013;215:163–166.
  4. Wicker S, Rabenau HF. Occupational exposures to bloodborne viruses among German dental professionals and students in a clinical setting. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2010;83:77–83.
  5. Chang H-H, Lee WK, Moon C, et al. The acceptable duration between occupational exposure to hepatitis B virus and hepatitis B immunoglobulin injection: Results from a Korean nationwide, multicenter study. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44:189–193.
  6. Cleveland JL, Barker L, Gooch BF, Beltrami EM, Cardo D. Use of HIV postexposure prophylaxis by dental health care personnel: An overview and updated recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133:1619–1626.
  7. Rymer W, Beniowski M, Mularska E. Postexposure prophylaxis for HIV, HBV, HCV. Recomm Polish AIDS Soc. 2015:31–39 (in Polish).
  8. Cardo D, Culver D, Ciesielski C, et al. A case-control study of HIV seroconversion in health care workers after percutaneous exposure. New Engl J Med. 1997;337:1485–1490.
  9. Act of 5 December 2008 on preventing and combating infections and infectious diseases in humans (Journal of Laws, No. 234, item 1570) (in Polish).
  10. Woode Owusu M, Wellington E, Rice B, Gill O, Ncube F. Eye of the needle: United Kingdom surveillance of significant occupational exposures to bloodborne viruses in healthcare workers: data to end 2013. Heal Prot Agency. 2014;5.
  11. Gańczak M. Magnitude of the problem and prevention methods assesment. Magazyn Pielęg Położ. 2012;15:7–8, 36 (in Polish).
  12. Prabhu A, Rao AP, Reddy V, et al. Needle safety awareness among dental nurses. Workplace Health Saf. 2014;62:243–248.
  13. Cleveland J, Cardo D. Occupational exposures to human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus: risk, prevention, and management. Dent Clin North Am. 2003;47:681–696.
  14. Nagao Y, Baba H, Torii K, et al. A long-term study of sharps injuries among health care workers in Japan. Am J Infect Control. 2007;35:407–411.
  15. Osazuwa-Peters N, Obarisiagbon A, Azodo CC, Ehizele AO, Obuekwe ON. Occupational exposure to sharp injuries among medical and dental house officers in Nigeria. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2013;26:283–290.
  16. Klein R, Freeman K, Taylor P, Stevens C. Occupational risk for hepatitis C virus infection among New York City dentists. Lancet. 1991;338:1539–1542.
  17. Thomas D, Gruninger S, Siew C, Joy E, Quinn T. Occupational risk of hepatitis C infections among general dentists and oral surgeons in North America. Am J Med. 2012;100:41–45.
  18. Bali R, Sharma P, Garg A. Incidence and patterns of needlestick injuries during intermaxillary fixation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;49:221–224.
  19. Quinn MM, Markkanen PK, Galligan CJ, et al. Sharps injuries and other blood and body fluid exposures among home health care nurses and aides. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(Suppl 3):710–717.
  20. Parks D, Yetman R, McNeese M, Burau K, Smolensky M. Day-night pattern in accidental exposures to blood-borne pathogens among medical students and residents. Chronobiol Int. 2000;17:61–70.
  21. Bilski B, Wysocki J. The level of knowledge of post-exposure prophylaxis of blood-borne infections at the workplace observed in nurses. Med Pr. 2005;56:375–378 (in Polish).
  22. Chen MY, Fox EF, Rogers CA. Post-exposure prophylaxis for human immunodeficiency virus: Knowledge and experience of junior doctors. Sex Transm Infect. 2001;77:444–445.
  23. Szarpak Ł, Kurowski A. Do double gloves protect against contamination during cannulation of blood vessels? A prospective randomized study. Med Pr. 2014;65:271–278 (in Polish).
  24. Sharma G, Gilson M, Nathan H, Makary M. Needlestick injuries among medical students: Incidence and implications. Acad Med. 2009;84:1815–1821.
  25. Tanner J, Parkinson H. Double gloving to reduce surgical cross infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:11–13.
  26. Krishnan P, Dick F, Murphy E. The impact of educational interventions on primary health care workers’ knowledge of occupational exposure to blood or body fluids. Occup Med (Chic Ill). 2007;57:98–103.
  27. Jeong JS, Son HM, Jeong IS, et al. Qualitative content analysis of psychologic discomfort and coping process after needlestick injuries among health care workers. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44:183–188.
  28. Kessler C, McGuinn M, Spec A, et al. Underreporting of blood and body fluid exposures among health care students and trainees in the acute care setting: A 2007 survey. Am J Infect Control. 2011;39:129–134.
  29. Jagger J, Perry J. Power in numbers: Using EPINet data to promote protective policies for healthcare workers. J Infus Nurs. 2002;25:15–20.
  30. Gańczak M. EPINet software for reporting occupational exposures to blood among medical personnel – rationale for its wide implementation in Poland. Med Pr. 2009;60:383–387 (in Polish).
© Wroclaw Medical University