Dental and Medical Problems

Dent Med Probl
Index Copernicus (ICV 2021) – 132.50
MEiN – 70 pts
CiteScore (2021) – 2.0
JCI (2021) – 0.5
Average rejection rate (2022) – 79.69%
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – quarterly

Download PDF

Dental and Medical Problems

2017, vol. 54, nr 2, April-June, p. 189–193

doi: 10.17219/dmp/70440

Publication type: review article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Fundamental factors related to orthodontic micro-implant stability: Review of the literature

Najważniejsze czynniki związane ze stabilizacją mikroimplantów ortodontycznych – przegląd piśmiennictwa

Jan Łyczek1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Joanna Antoszewska-Smith1,A,B,C,D,E,F

1 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland


The development and introduction of temporary intraoral anchorage devices (TISAD) in the beginning of the 21st century had a great impact on contemporary orthodontics. The enhancement of the scope of orthodontic treatment, improved efficiency, reduction of both the treatment time and need for the patient’s compliance, all of these are the crucial advantages the TISAD have provided to our profession. However, there are also some limiting factors pertaining to this anchorage reinforcement technique which must be borne in mind prior to clinical application. Among some others, premature failure of the micro-implants is the most significant problem related to their utilization, as it entails a repetition of the insertion procedure, increasing the cost and duration of treatment and causing the patient’s discomfort. Therefore, recognition of the factors related to the stability of orthodontic micro-implants is necessary for their efficient clinical application and maximum survival rates. Since over the last decade there has been noteworthy progress in the research investigating the issue of micro-implant stability, a review of the most current literature pertaining to this topic was the aim of our article, and ultimately providing clinical recommendations.

Key words

stability, micro-implants, success rates, micro-screws, TAD

Słowa kluczowe

stabilność, mikroimplanty, współczynniki sukcesu, mikrośruby, TAD

References (44)

  1. Baek SH, Kim BM, Kyung SH, Lim JK, Kim YH. Success rate and risk factors associated with mini implants reinstalled in the maxilla. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:895–901.
  2. Luzi C, Verna C, Melsen B. A prospective clinical investigation of the failure rate of immediately loaded mini implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Prog Orthodont. 2007;8:192–201.
  3. Wiechmann D, Meyer U, Büchter A. Success rate of mini- and micro implants used for orthodontic anchor age: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2007;18:263–267.
  4. Antoszewska J, Papadopoulos MA, Park HS, Ludwig B. Five year experience with orthodontic miniscrew implants: A retrospective investigation of factors influencing success rates. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:158.e1–10.
  5. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:373–378.
  6. Motoyoshi M. Clinical indices for orthodontic mini implants. J Oral Sci. 2011;53:407–412.
  7. Wilmes B, Rademacher C, Olthoff G, Drescher D. Parameters affecting primary stability of orthodontic mini implants. J Orofac Orthop. 2006;67:162–174.
  8. Chen CH, Chang CS, Hsieh CH, et al. The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1209–1213.
  9. Sarul M, Minch L, Park HS, Antoszewska Smith J. Effect of the length of orthodontic mini screw implants on their long term stability: A prospective study. Angle Orthod. 2015;85:33–38.
  10. Crismani AG, Bertl MH, Celar AG, Bantleon HP, Burstone CJ. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: Review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:108–113.
  11. Dalessandri D, Salgarello S, Dalessandri M, et al. Determinants for success rates of temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: A meta analysis (n > 50). Eur J Orthod. 2014;36:303–313.
  12. Migliorati M, Benedicenti S, Signori A. Thread shape factor: evaluation of three different orthodontic miniscrews stability. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35:401–405.
  13. Chaddad K, Ferreira AF, Geurs N, Reddy MS. Influence of surface characteristics on survival rates of mini implants. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:107–113.
  14. Moon CH, Park HK, Nam JS, Im JS, Baek SH. Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138:51–57.
  15. Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee, JJ, Kok SH. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:100–106.
  16. Chen YJ, Chang HH, Huang CY, et al. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2007;18:768–775.
  17. Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Lee JW, Kim SH, Kim TW. Survival analysis of orthodontic mini implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:194–199.
  18. Lim HJ, Eun CS, Cho JH, Lee KH, Hwang HS. Factors associated with initial stability of miniscrews for orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:236–242.
  19. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11:491–501.
  20. Chen YJ, Chang HH, Lin HY, et al. Stability of miniplates and miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage: Experience with 492 temporary anchorage devices. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2008;19:1188–1196.
  21. Çehreli S, Arman Özçırpıcı A. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone implant contact of self drilling and self tapping orthodontic microimplants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142:187–195.
  22. Migliorati M, Benedicenti S, Signori A, et al. Thread shape factor: Evaluation of three different orthodontic miniscrews stability. Eur J Orthod. 2012;35:401–405.
  23. Wilmes B, Drescher D. Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40:697–703.
  24. Cha JY, Kil JK, Yoon TM, Hwang CJ. Miniscrew stability evaluated with computerized tomography scanning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:73–79.
  25. McManus MM, Qian F, Grosland NM, Marshall SD, Southard TE. Effect of miniscrew placement torque on resistance to miniscrew movement under load. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:93–98.
  26. Motoyoshi M, Yoshida T, Ono A, Shimizu N. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:779–784.
  27. Marquezan M, Trindade Mattos C, Franzotti Sant’Anna E, de Souza MM, Cople Maia L. Does cortical thickness influence the primary stability of miniscrews? A systematic review and meta analysis. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:1093–1103.
  28. Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, Shimizu N. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini implant. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2006;17:109–114.
  29. Meursinge Reynders RA, Ladu L, van Etten Jamaludin F, Bipat S. Insertion torque and success of orthodontic mini implants: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142:596–614.
  30. Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;130:18–25.
  31. Viwattanatipa N, Thanakitcharu S, Uttraravichien A, Pitiphat W. Survival analyses of surgical miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136: 29–36.
  32. Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Ericsson I, Lindhe J. Spontaneous progression of experimentally induced peri implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:845–849.
  33. Ericsson I, Berglundh T, Marinello C, Liljenberg B, Lindhe J. Long standing plaque and gingivitis at implants and teeth in the dog. Clin Oral Implan Res. 1992;3:99–103.
  34. Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, Hashimoto T, Kyung HM, Takano Yamamoto T. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:Suppl 4:68–73.
  35. Kuroda S, Sugawara Y, Deguchi T, Kyung HM, Takano Yamamoto T. Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: success rates and postoperative discomfort. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:9–15.
  36. Bayat E, Bauss O. Effect of smoking on the failure rates of orthodonticminiscrews. J Orofac Orthop. 2010;71:117–124.
  37. Lim HJ, Choi YJ, Evans CA, Hwang HS. Predictors of initial stability of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:528–532.
  38. Chen Y, Shin HI, Kyung HM. Biomechanical and histological comparison of self drilling and self tapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:44–50.
  39. Türköz C, Ataç MS, Tuncer C, Balos Tuncer B, Kaan E. The effect of drill free and drilling methods on the stability of mini implants under early orthodontic loading in adolescent patients. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:533–536.
  40. Melsen B, Costa A. Immediate loading of implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Orthod Res. 2000;3:23–28.
  41. Büchter A, Wiechmann D, Koerdt S, Wiesmann HP, Piffko J, Meyer U. Load related implant reaction of mini implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Oral Implan Res 2005;16:473–479.
  42. Motoyoshi M, Matsuoka M, Shimizu N. Application of orthodontic mini implants in adolescents. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36:695–699.
  43. Jung BA, Kunkel M, Göllner P, Liechti T, Wagner W, Wehrbein H. Prognostic parameters contributing to palatal implant failures: A long term survival analysis of 239 patients. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2012;23:746–750.
  44. Cho UH, Yu W, Kyung HM. Root contact during drilling for microimplant placement. Affect of surgery site and operator expertise. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:130–136.