Dental and Medical Problems

Dent Med Probl
Index Copernicus (ICV 2021) – 132.50
MEiN – 70 pts
CiteScore (2021) – 2.0
JCI (2021) – 0.5
Average rejection rate (2022) – 79.69%
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – quarterly

Download PDF

Dental and Medical Problems

2017, vol. 54, nr 2, April-June, p. 179–182

doi: 10.17219/dmp/73836

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Assessment of age with mandibular first molar: An orthopantogram study

Ocena wieku na podstawie obrazu na zdjęciu pantomograficznym pierwszego dolnego zęba trzonowego

Siddharth Mehta1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Arun S. Urala1,A, Vineetha R,B, Anjali Mehta2,D, Surendra Lodha3,E


2 Private Practitioner, Manipal, India

3 Private Practitioner, Bhilwara, India


Background. Assessment of age plays an important role in identifying living beings as well as the dead. Comparing different body parts for age estimation, teeth show the least changes after death and can also be checked in living individuals. This helps in forensics as well as in studying growth.
Objectives. The aim of this study was assess the age for Indian individuals from mandibular first molars using orthopantogram.
Material and Methods. Orthopantograms were obtained from 370 Indian subjects in the age group 6–40 years. The subjects were randomly divided into 2 samples; a study sample (n = 240) and a test sample (n = 130). A regression equation to calculate age was generated from the PCTHR (pulp chamber crown root trunk height ratio) and applied on the test sample to check for reliability of the equation.
Results. There was a significant negative correlation between actual age and PCTHR (r = –0.765: p = < 0.0001) in the study group. The regression equation generated from the study sample was calculated age = –94.627 × (PCTHR) + 43.585. When used on the test sample, the calculated age showed no statistically significant difference with the actual age (p = 0.076). The mean difference between actual and calculated age was 3.275 ± 2.188 years.
Conclusion. The method of using PCTHR can be applied correctly to assess the age of Indian individuals.

Key words

age assessment, pulp height, mandibular molar, orthopantogram

Słowa kluczowe

ocena wieku, wysokość miazgi, ząb trzonowy, zdjęcie pantomograficzne

References (15)

  1. Saxena S. Age estimation of Indian adults from orthopantomographs. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25:225–229.
  2. Mathew DG, Rajesh S, Koshi E, Priya LE, Nair AS, Mohan A. Adult forensic age estimation using mandibular first molar radiographs: A novel technique. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2013;5:56–59.
  3. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Belcastro GM, Bonfiglioli B, Rastelli E, Cingolani M. Age estimation by pulp/tooth ratio in canines by peri-apical X-rays. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52:166–170.
  4. Demirjian, A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Human Biol. 1973;45:211.
  5. Gustafson G. Age determination on teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1950;41:45–54.
  6. Star H, Thevissen P, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Solheim T, Willems G. Human dental age estimation by calculation of pulp-tooth volume ratios yielded on clinically acquired cone beam computed tomography images of monoradicular teeth. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(Suppl 1):S77–82.
  7. Kvaal SI, Kolltveit KM, Thomsen IO, Solheim T. Age estimation of adults from dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int. 1995;74:175 185.
  8. Solheim T, Sundnes PK. Dental age estimation of Norwegian adults – A comparison of different methods. Forensic Sci Int. 1980;16:e7–17.
  9. Tavrianos C, Mastagas D, Stavrianou I, Karaiskou O. Dental age estimation of adults: A review of methods and principals. Res J Med Sci. 2008;2:258–268.
  10. Rothwell BR. Principles of dental identification. Dent Clin North Am. 2001;45:253–270.
  11. Nolla CM. The development of permanent teeth. J Dent Child. 1960;27:254–266.
  12. Babshet M, Acharya AB, Naikmasur VG. Age estimation in Indians from pulp/tooth area ratio of mandibular canines. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;197:125.e1–4.
  13. Drusini AG, Toso O, Ranzato C. The coronal pulp cavity index: A biomarker for age determination in human adults. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1997;103:353–363.
  14. Limdiwala PG, Shah JS. Age estimation by using dental radiographs. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2013; 5:118 122.
  15. Shah PH, Venkatesh R. Pulp/tooth ratio of mandibular first and second molars on panoramic radiographs: An aid for forensic age estimation. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016;8:112–115.