Dental and Medical Problems

Dent Med Probl
Index Copernicus (ICV 2020) – 128.41
MEiN – 70 pts
CiteScore (2021) – 2.0
JCI – 0.5
Average rejection rate (2021) – 81.35%
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – quarterly

Download PDF

Dental and Medical Problems

2017, vol. 54, nr 1, January-March, p. 117–118

doi: 10.17219/dmp/69933

Publication type: letter to editor

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Reply to the Letter to the Editor on the article “Soft tissue profile changes after mandibular setback surgery” (Dent Med Probl 2016, 53, 4, 447–453)

Odpowiedź na list do Redakcji dotyczący pracy pt. „Zmiana profilu tkanek miękkich po jednoszczękowych zabiegach korekcji progenii” (Dent Med Probl 2016, 53, 4, 447–453)

Katarzyna Bogusiak1,, Marek Kociński2,, Adam Łutkowski2,, Andrzej Materka2,, Aneta Neskoromna-Jędrzejczak1,

1 Department of Craniomaxillofacial and Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland

2 Institute of Electronics, Department of Medical Electronics, Technical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland

Key words

soft tissue profile, cephalometry, bilateral sagittal split osteostomy (BSSO), extraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (EVRO)

Słowa kluczowe

profil tkanek miękkich, cefalometria, obustronna strzałkowa osteotomia gałęzi żuchwy, pionowa osteotomia gałęzi żuchwy z dostępu zewnątrzustnego

References (27)

  1. McNamara JA Jr, Brust EW, Riolo ML. Soft tissue evaluation of individuals with an ideal occlusion and a well-balanced face. In: Esthetics and the treatment of facial form. Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1993 (Monograph 28, Cra-niofacial Growth Series).
  2. Subtelny JD. A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and their profile characteristics, defined in relation to underlying skeletal structures. Am J Orthod. 1958;45:481–507.
  3. Burstone CJ. Integumental contour and extension patterns. Angle Orthod. 1959;29:93–104.
  4. Bowker WD, Meredith HV. A metric analysis of the facial profile. Angle Orthod. 1959;29:149–160.
  5. Merrifield LL. The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod. 1966;52:804–822.
  6. Ricketts RM. Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod. 1968;54:272–289.
  7. Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg. 1978;36:269–277.
  8. Holdaway RA. A soft tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod. 1983;84:1–28.
  9. Holdaway RA. A soft tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:279–293.
  10. Williams S. A short guide on cephalometry in orthodontics. Polorto. Częstochowa 1998 [in Polish].
  11. Neger M. A quantitative method for the evaluation of the soft-tissue facial profile. Am J Orthod. 1959;45:738–751.
  12. Lusterman EA. The esthetics of the occidental face: A study of dentofacial morphology based upon anthropologic criteria. Am J Orthod. 1963;49:826–850.
  13. Hwang HS, Kim WS, McNamara JA Jr. A comparative study of two methods of quantifying the soft tissue profile. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70:200–207.
  14. Olszewski R, Villamil MB, Trevisan DG, et al. Towards an integrated system for planning and assisting maxillofacial orthognathic surgery. Comput Meth Prog Bio. 2008;9:13–21.
  15. Shimomatsu K, Nozoe E, Ishihata K, Okawachi T, Nakamura N. Three-dimensional analyses of facial soft tissue configuration of Japanese fe-males with jaw deformity – a trial of polygonal view of facial soft tissue deformity in orthognathic patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40:559–567.
  16. Swennen GR, Schutyser F, Barth EL, De Groeve P, De Mey A. A new method of 3-D cephalometry Part I: the anatomic Cartesian 3-D reference system. J Craniofac Surg. 2006;17:314–325.
  17. Baysal A, Sahan AO, Ozturk MA, Uysal T. Reproducibility and reliability of three-dimensional soft tissue landmark identification using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry. Angle Orthod. 2016;86:1004–1009.
  18. Treil J, Braga J, Aït Ameur A. 3D representation of skull and soft tissues. Usefulness in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery. J Radiol. 2009;90:634–641.
  19. Nouri M, Hamidiaval S, Akbarzadeh Baghban A, Basafa M, Fahim M. Efficacy of a newly designed cephalometric analysis software for McNama-ra analysis in comparison with Dolphin software. J Dent. (Tehran) 2015;12:60–69.
  20. Hwang HS, Kim WS, McNamara JA Jr. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlu-sions and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:72–80.
  21. Ayoub AF, Yahya AM. Soft tissue response to anterior maxillary osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1991;6:183–190.
  22. Jung YJ, Kim MJ, Baek SH. Hard and soft tissue changes after correction of mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry by mandibular setback surgery: three-dimensional analysis using computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:763–771.
  23. Gjørup H, Athanasiou AE. Soft-tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy. Am J Orthod Den-tofacial Orthop. 1991;100:312–323.
  24. Chunmaneechote P, Friede H. Mandibular setback osteotomy: facial soft tissue behavior and possibility to improve the accuracy of the soft tissue profile prediction with the use of a computerized cephalometric program: Quick Ceph Image Pro: v. 2.5. Clin Orthod Res. 1999;2:85–98.
  25. Solow B, Tallgren A. Natural head position in standing subjects. Acta Odontol Scand. 1971;29:591–607.
  26. Momeni Danaei SH, Zamiri B, Khajeh F, Torkan S, Ghodsi Bushehri S. Comparative study of facial soft tissue profile changes following bilateral sagittal split and subcondylar osteotomies in patients with mandibular prognathism. J Dent Sch. 2013; 30:248–255.
  27. Bogusiak K, Kociński M, Łutkowski A, Materka A, Neskoromna--Jędrzejczak A. Soft tissue profile changes after mandibular setback surgery. Dent Med Probl. 2016;53:447–453.