Dental and Medical Problems

Dent Med Probl
Index Copernicus (ICV 2020) – 128.41
MEiN – 70 pts
CiteScore (2021) – 2.0
JCI – 0.5
Average rejection rate (2021) – 81.35%
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – quarterly

Download PDF

Dental and Medical Problems

2015, vol. 52, nr 4, October-December, p. 491–498

doi: 10.17219/dmp/59139

Publication type: review article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 Open Access

Irrigants Used in Endodontic Treatment – Review of the Literature

Środki płuczące stosowane w leczeniu endodontycznym – przegląd piśmiennictwa

Marta Mrużyńska1,B,D, Urszula Kanaffa-Kilijańska1,E,F

1 Department of Conservative and Pediatric Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland

Abstract

Endodontic treatment can be successful if we use the appropriate techniques to prepare the canals in combination with the correct application of chemical agents and tight sealing of the root canal system. After the mechanical preparation of the canal, a lot of bacteria remains in the numerous branches, and the presence of bacteria in the canal has a negative influence on the final treatment result. The use of a rinsing agent supports the removal of intracanal micro-organisms and obtaining effective disinfection, which increases the probability of success of endodontic treatment. This study presents a review of the literature concerning the rinsing means which are used most often during root canal treatment. The authors describe the antibacterial properties of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine, novel irrigants such as alexidine and octenidine, peroxide’s effect, the effect of chelation agents like disodium versenate and citric acid, and also ethyl and isopropyl alcohol. Unfortunately, there is not a canal rinsing liquid which could fulfill all the requirements. Therefore, it is extremely important to know all the negative and positive points of particular preparations and the scope of their activity in order to use such an agent in the correct way, depending on the clinical situation.

Key words

EDTA, chlorhexidine, root canal rinsing, sodium hypochlorite, endodontics

Słowa kluczowe

EDTA, chlorheksydyna, płukanie kanałów korzeniowych, podchloryn sodu, endodoncja

References (58)

  1. Paque F., Ganahl D., Peters O.A.: Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. J. Endod. 2009, 35, 1056–1059.
  2. Peters O.A., Laib A., Gohring T.N., Barbakow F.: Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. J. Endod. 2001, 27, 1–6.
  3. Sjogren U., Figdor D., Persson S., Sundqvist G.: Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int. Endod. J. 1997, 30, 297–306.
  4. Arabska-Przedpełska B., Pawlicka H.: Present endodontics in practice. Bestom DENT Onet.pl, Łódź 2011 [in Polish].
  5. Zehnder M.: Root canal irrigants. J. Endod. 2006, 32, 389–393.
  6. Hancock H.H. 3rd, Sigurdsson A., Trope M., Moiseiwitsch J.: Bacteria isolated after unsuccessful endodontic treatment in North American population. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2001, 91, 579–586.
  7. Ruff M.L., McClanahan S.B., Babel B.S.: In vitro antifungal efficiency of four irritants as a final rinse. J. Endod. 2006, 32, 331–333.
  8. Wujec P., Pawlicka H.: Irrigants recommended in root canal treatment-literature review. Dent. Med. Probl. 2008, 45, 466–472 [in Polish].
  9. Wilczyńska K., Kwiatkowska M., Wilczyński M.: Root canal system irrigation – literature review. Stomatol. Współcz. 2014, 21, 2, 34–40 [in Polish].
  10. Lipski M.: Sodium hypochlorite in tooth endodontic treatment. Magazyn Stomatol. 1994, 4, 1, 14–16 [in Polish].
  11. Barańska-Gachowska M.: Endodontics of development and mature age. Wyd. Czelej, Lublin 2011 [in Polish].
  12. Stojicic S., Shen Y., Qian W., Johnson B., Haapasalo M.: Antibacterial and smear layer removal ability of a novel irrigant, QMIX. Int. Endod. J. 2012, 45, 363–371.
  13. Gomes B.P.F.A., Ferraz C.C.R., Vianna M.E., Berber V.B., Teixeira F.B., Souza-Filho F.: In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Int. Endod. J. 2001, 34, 424–428.
  14. Lipski M., Woźniak K., Lichota D., Górski M., Łagocka R.: Usefulness of File-Eze preparate during ultrasonic preparation of root canal-scanning electron microscope investigation. Magazyn Stomatol. 2002, 12, 5, 24–26 [in Polish].
  15. Sirtes G., Waltimo T., Schaetzie M., Zehnder M.: The effects of temperature on sodium hypochlorite shortterm stability, pulp dissolution capacity, and antimicrobial efficiency. J. Endod. 2005, 31, 669–671.
  16. Malicka B., Ziętek M., Grzebieluch W.: Use of chlorhexidine in dentistry. Dent. Med. Probl. 2005, 42, 497–505 [in Polish].
  17. Venghat S., Hegde M., Shetty C.: Irrigants used in endodontics. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2014, 3, 126–132.
  18. Okino L.A., Sigueira E.L., Santos M., Bombana A.C., Figueiredo J.A.: Dissolution of pulp tissue by aqueous solution of chlorhexidine digluconate and chlorhexidine digluconate gel. Int. Endod. J. 2004, 37, 38–41.
  19. Onca O., Hosgor M., Hilmioglu S., Zekioglu O., Eronat C., Burhanoglu D.: Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants. Int. Endod. J. 2003, 36, 423–432.
  20. Shafer E.: Irrigation of the root canal. Endodontie, 2007, 1, 11–27.
  21. Basrani B.R., Manek S., Sodhi R.N., Fillery E., Manzur A.: Interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate. J. Endod. 2007, 33, 966–969.
  22. Basrani B.R., Manek S., Fillery E.: Using diazotization to characterize the effect of heat or sodium hypochlorite on 2% chlorhexidine. J. Endod. 2009, 36, 312–314.
  23. Basrani B.R., Manek S., Mathers D.I., Fillery E., Sodhi R.N.: Determination of 4-chloroaniline and its derivatives formed in the interaction of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine by using gas chromatography. J. Endod. 2010, 36, 312–314.
  24. Mortenson D., Sadilek M., Flake N.M., Pararype A., Heling I., Johnson J.D., Cohence N.: The effect of using an alternative irrigant between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine to prevent the formation of para-chloroaniline within the root canal system. Int. Endod. J. 2012, 45, 878–882.
  25. Suchodolski Ł., Wilkoński W., Jamróz-Wilkońska L., Gabryś S., Krupiński J., Opiła J.: Influence of rinsing root canal protocols for sealness of gutta-percha fillings with two root canal sealers MTA-Fillapex and 2Seal. Magazyn Stomatol., 2011, 21, 7–8 [online in Polish].
  26. Riuz-Linares M., Ferrer-Luque C., Arias-Moliz T., Castro P. Aguado B., Baca P.: Antimicrobial activity of alexidine, chlorhexidine and cetrimide against Streptococcus mutans biofilm. Ann. Clin.Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2014, 13, 41–28.
  27. Silveira L., Baca P., Arias-Moliz M., Rodriguez-Archilla A., Ferrer-Luque C.: Antimicrobial activity of alexidine alone and associated with N-acetylcysteine against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2013, 5. 146–149.
  28. Rita Ch., Nikhil V.: Emerging trends in Endodontic Irrigants: WHO will write the last line? Endodontol. 2014, 26 Issue 2.
  29. Mujoo T., Ballal V.: Novel root canal irrigants: an endodontic experience. Int. J. Dent. Health Sci. 2014, 1, 356–366.
  30. Kim H.S., Zhu Q., Baek S.H., Jung I.Y., Son W.J., Chang S.W., Lee W., Gu Y., Lee Y., Hong S.T., Bae K.S., Kim J.W., Cho K., Kum K.Y.: Chemical interaction of alexidine and sodium hypochlorite. J. Endod. 2012 38, 112–116.
  31. Tirali R.E., Turan Y., Akal N., Kaharanz Z.C.: In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of NaOCl and Octenisept in elimination of endodontic pathogens. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2009, 108, e117–e120.
  32. Tandjung L., Waltimo T., Hauser I., Heide P., Decher E.M., Weiger R.: Octenidine in root canal dentin disinfection ex vivo. Int. Endod. J. 2007, 40, 845–851.
  33. Makkar S., Aggarwal A., Parischa S., Kapur I.: Comparative evaluation of octenidine hydrochloride as antibacterial root canal irrigant. Indian J. Oral Sci. 2015, 6, 10–13.
  34. De Lucena J.M.V.M., Decker E.M., Walter C., Boeira L.S., Lost C., Weiger R.: Antimicrobial effectiveness of intracanal medicaments on Enterococcus faecalis: chlorhexidine versus octenidine. Int. Endod. J. 2013, 46, 53–61.
  35. Tirali R.E., Gulsahi K., Cehreli S.B., Karahan Z.C., Uzunoglu E., Elhan A.: Antimicrobial efficacy of octenidine hydrochloride, MTAD and chlorhexidine gluconate mixed with calcium hydroxide. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2013, 14, 456–460.
  36. Tirali R.E., Bodur H., Sipahi B., Sungurtekin E.: Evaluation of the antimicrobial activities of chlorhexidine gluconate, sodium hypochlorite and octenidine hydrochloride in vitro. Aust. Endod. J. 2013, 39, 15–18.
  37. Anuradha B., Indira R., Lalitha M.K., Sriram T.: A new irrigant against E. faecalis in root canal disinfection. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia, 2014, 11, 121–127.
  38. Eldeniz A.U., Guneser M.B., Akbulut M.B.: Comparative antifungal efficacy of light activated disinfection and octenidine hydrochloride with contemporary endodontic irrigants. Lasers Med. Sci. 2015, 30, 669–675.
  39. Kustra P., Zarzecka J.: Chemical preparation of endodontic system – literature review. Twój Przeg. Stomatol. 2009, 9, 44–51 [in Polish].
  40. Lipski M., Lichota D., Górski M., Dura W., Droździk A.: Root canal walls purity with unfinished development of root, irrigated 2% chlorhexidine. SEM examination. Annual PAM, 2013, 59, 81–85 [in Polish].
  41. Violich D.R., Chandler N.P.: The smear layer in endodontics – a review. Int. Endod. J. 2010, 43, 2–15.
  42. Wujec P., Pawlicka H.: Interactions between irrigants used in endodontic treatment. Magazyn Stomatol. 2011, 21, 2, 64–67 [in Polish].
  43. Stachera N., Kroczyńska P., Gaj E., Lipski M.: Smear layer influence for root canal filling sealness made with Gutta Flow sealant. In vitro examinations. Magazyn Stomatol. 2011, 21, 9, 131–134 [in Polish].
  44. Czonstkowsky M., Wilson E.G., Holstein F.A.: The smear layer in endodontics. Dent. Clin. North Am. 1990, 34, 13–25.
  45. Sen B.H., Wesselink P.R., Tarkan M.: The smear layer a phenomenon in root canal therapy. Int. Endod. J. 1995, 28, 141–148.
  46. Castellucci A., West D.: Endodontics. Florence, Il Tridente 2005.
  47. Kuah H.G., Lui J.N., Tseng P.S., Chen N.N.: The effect of EDTA with and without ultrasonics on removal on the smear layer. J. Endod. 2010, 36, 512–514.
  48. Grawehr M.: Interactions of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid with sodium hypochlorite an aqueous solutions. Int. Endod. J. 2003, 36, 411–415.
  49. Wong S., Mundy L., Chandler N., Upritchard J., Purton D., Tompkins G.: Antibacterial properties of root canal lubricants: A comparison with commonly used irrigants. Aust. Endod. J. 2014, 40, 111–115
  50. Lipski M.: Lubricants used during endodontic treatment. Magazyn Stomatol. 2002, 12, 9, 106–107 [in Polish].
  51. Prado M., Gusman H., Gomes B.P.F.A., Simao R.A.: Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the effectiveness of phosphoric acid in smear layer removal when compared with EDTA and citric acid. J. Endod. 2011, 37, 255–258.
  52. Pawlicka H.: Citric acid effectiveness evaluation as root canal irrigant. SEM examinations. Stomatol. Współcz. 1995, 2, 539–543 [in Polish].
  53. Portenier I., Waltiomo T., Orstavik D., Haapasalo M.: Killing of Enterococcus faecalis by MTAD and chlorhexidine digluconate with or without cetrimide in the presence or absence of dentine powder or BSA. J. Endod. 2006, 32, 138–141.
  54. Pawlicka H., Pietrzak P.: Enterococcus faecalis – its role in endodontic treatment and methods of elimination from infected root canals. Dent. Med. Probl. 2007, 44, 390–395 [in Polish].
  55. Suchodolski Ł., Łaszkiewicz J., Ciesielski P.: Methods of Enterococcus faecalis elimination from infected root canals – literature review. Czas. Stomatol. 2007, 60, 111–117 [in Polish].
  56. Stevens R.W., Strother J.M., McClanahan S.B.: Leakage and sealer penetration in smear-free dentin after final rinse with 95% ethanol. J. Endod. 2006, 32, 785–788.
  57. Wilcox L.R., Wiemann A.H.: Effect of final alcohol rinse on sealer coverage of obturated root canals. J. Endod. 1995, 21, 256–258.
  58. Engel G.T., Goodel G.G., McClanahan S.B.: Sealer penetration and apical microleakage in smear-free dentin after final rinse with either 70% isopropyl alcohol or peridex. J. Endod. 2005, 31, 620–623.