Dental and Medical Problems

Dent Med Probl
Impact Factor (IF 2024) – 3.9
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI 2024) - 1.36
Scopus CiteScore (2024) – 5.0
Index Copernicus Value (ICV 2023) – 181.00
MNiSW – 70 pts
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – bimonthly


 

Download original text (EN)

Dental and Medical Problems

2023, vol. 60, nr 4, October-December, p. 593–599

doi: 10.17219/dmp/150834

Publication type: original article

Language: English

License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Cite as:


Özveren N, Sevinç B, Sarıalioğlu Güngör A, Baltacı E, Serindere G, Özgür Ö. Evaluation of knowledge and awareness about teledentistry among dentists and patients living in Turkey. Dent Med Probl. 2023;60(4):593–599. doi:10.17219/dmp/150834

Evaluation of knowledge and awareness about teledentistry among dentists and patients living in Turkey

Neslihan Özveren1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Büşra Sevinç1,B,C,D, Ayça Sarıalioğlu Güngör2,A,B,C, Ezgi Baltacı1,B,D, Gözde Serindere3,D,E,F, Özge Özgür1,B,D

1 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey

2 Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Bezmialem Vakıf University, Istanbul, Turkey

3 Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey

Abstract

Background. Teledentistry is a field of telemedicine that combines digital technology and clinical dentistry, enabling remote communication between dentists and patients.

Objectives. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the knowledge and awareness of dentists and patients about teledentistry in Turkey.

Material and methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted among general and specialist dentists in Turkey, and dental patients in Edirne, Turkey. A questionnaire prepared in Google Docs was shared virtually among Turkish dentists, as well as administered to the patients referred to the university dental clinic in Edirne.

Results. Among the 336 dentists participating in the study, 69.9% were female, 39.6% were working in the profession for 1–5 years, and 48.5% were specialist dentists. A total of 86.9% of dentists stated they would like to use teledentistry for radiological examinations, some follow-up examinations, and for follow-up during holidays. There were 21.1% of dentists who thought that teledentistry practices could be the new standard of oral healthcare, and only 34.0% were willing to try such practices. Among the 447 patients in the study, 49.9% were female, 79.0% were aged 20–44 years, and 54.4% had middle income. There were 74.5% of patients who stated that it would be easier to communicate with the dentist via a teledentistry application, 80.3% of patients in underserved regions stated it would facilitate access to the dentist, 76.3% of patients stated that it would reduce costs, and 88.8% of patients thought that this method could help overcome the problem of isolation during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic period.

Conclusions. Based on the results, it can be said that the teledentistry approach could provide con­venience for both dentists and patients in terms of dentist–patient communication, cost and efficiency of dental care.

Keywords: oral health, questionnaire, awareness, teledentistry

Introduction

The rapid development of communication techno­logies over the years has led to a different dimension of the service exchange between healthcare professionals and patients in the healthcare system. Telehealth encom­passes all medical activities, such as diagnosis, treatment, disease monitoring and prevention, continuing the education of healthcare providers and consumers, and research and evaluation.1 The term ‘telemedicine’ refers to health services that are provided in the form of synchronous (voice or video calls) or asynchronous (store-and-forward) interactions, using electronic communication technologies instead of the patient and doctor meeting in person.2, 3 Teledentistry is a branch of telemedicine that can be applied in all fields of dentistry, such as oral and dental care, consultation, and remote patient monitoring and treatment planning, in order to improve oral and dental health. It uses health information technology and telecommunication systems.4, 5

Teledentistry as a novel approach was widely used during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.6 It involves several issues, such as consulting potential new patients, reviewing the results of treatment, pre-interviewing emergency patients, and it also can be used as an initial screening tool. The advantages of teledentistry include the remote control of fast and recordable data, simultaneous communication with many people, and the reduction of hospital costs and patient waiting time.7, 8 Through teledentistry applications, shortening the time to reach a specialist can prevent delays in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases.9, 10 Teledentistry also has the potential to address disparities in oral healthcare between rural and urban communities.11, 12 Thus, it can contribute to the improvement of patients’ quality of life.

Research has shown that teledentistry has a high level of sensitivity and specificity.13, 14 Queyroux et al. found much consistency between the clinical examination, which is the gold standard, and teledentistry in their study.15 It has also been reported that the positive predictive value and the accuracy rate in teledentistry, as well as the sensitivity of teledentistry applications, are quite high.16, 17

Concerns about data quality and security, the reimbursement procedures, necessary technical infrastructure, the licensing of the programs to be used, the risk of violation of the patient’s privacy, appropriate and secure Internet support for data, image and voice transmission, and the inherent risk of improper diagnosis are the issues to be considered with regard to the increasing use of teledentistry practices.18, 19, 20 One of the obstacles to the adoption of teledentistry practices by patients and physicians may be the lack of information on this subject.21

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the know­ledge and awareness of dentists and patients about teledentistry in Turkey.

Material and methods

Methods

Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the medi­cal research ethics committee at the Faculty of Medicine of Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey (TUFT-BAEK 2020/319). The study was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed written consent was obtained from the patients and dentists, and the confidentiality of answers was assured.

This cross-sectional study was conducted among gene­ral and specialist dentists in Turkey, and dental patients in Edirne. After a questionnaire (Table 1) was prepared in Google Forms, we collected the emails of dentists in Turkey and shared the questionnaire virtually with them. We also asked patients who had been referred to the university dental clinic in Edirne between November 11, 2020 and April 2, 2021 to complete the survey (Table 2). The inclusion criteria for dentists were as follows: residing in Turkey; working within the borders of Turkey; having graduated from any faculty of dentistry in Turkey; and having access to electronic media. The inclusion criterion for patients was having been examined at the Trakya University Oral and Dental Health Practice and Research Center.

Sample size

According to the Turkish Dental Association and the Turkish Statistical Institute 2019 report, 38,948 dentists were living within the borders of Turkey, and the population of Edirne was 413,903. With a 95% confidence interval (CI) and a margin of error of 5%, at least 320 dentists and 394 patients were found to be required as the sample size. Considering the missing data, 370 dentists and 450 patients were planned to participate in the study.

Results

The distribution of the 336 dentists participating in the study regarding gender, the duration of employment and the institutions they were working for is summarized in Table 3. The distribution of dentists according to their specialties is shown in Figure 1. Among the dentists participating in the study, 69.9% were female, 39.6% were working in the profession for 1–5 years, and 48.5% were specialist dentists.

There were 86.9% of dentists who stated that they would like to use teledentistry for radiological examinations, some follow-up examinations, and for follow-up during holidays; 82.4% stated they would like to discuss patients with other dentists or use the function of asking for opinions through teledentistry applications. However, 66.1% of dentists thought that follow-up with a teledentistry application would not be sufficient, 85.4% thought they would have a problem of trust in the patient informa­tion obtained in this way, and 46.4% thought they might experience patient confidentiality violation.

As a result, 21.1% of dentists thought that teledentistry practices could be the new standard of oral healthcare, and only 34.0% were willing to try these practices.

The effects of gender, years of experience, institution, and specialization on the dentists’ awareness of tele­dentistry practices, their willingness to try teledentistry practices, as well as the possibility of employing tele­dentistry as a standard practice in oral healthcare were evaluated. The effects of these factors are summarized in Table 3.

Accordingly, while there was no difference between genders in terms of being aware, it was observed that those who had worked longer, were specialist dentists, or were working at a university or the Provincial Health Directorate Oral and Dental Health Center (PHDODHC) were more likely to be aware of teledentistry practices.

It was determined that the same factors did not have a significant effect on the dentists’ views regarding the possibility of teledentistry becoming a standard practice in oral healthcare and their willingness to try teledentistry practices (p > 0.05).

The distribution of the 447 patients who participated in the study regarding gender, age, the educational status, and the income status is summarized in Table 4. There were 49.9% of participants in the study who were female, 79.0% were aged 20–44 years, and 54.4% had middle income. The educational status of the patients is shown in Figure 2.

Among the patients, 74.5% stated that it would be easier to communicate with the dentist via a teledentistry application, 80.3% of patients in underserved regions res­ponded that it would facilitate access to the dentist, 71.4% of patients stated that teledentistry practices would contribute to regular dental examinations, 79.0% of patients indicated that teledentistry could save time, 76.3% of patients stated that it would reduce costs, and 88.8% of patients thought that this method could help overcome the problem of isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic period. However, 51.0% of patients stated that follow-up with the use of teledentistry would not be sufficient, 62.2% of patients indicated that the interviews conducted through a teledentistry application would not be as accurate as face-to-face interviews, and 24.8% of patients marked that they might experience personal information privacy violation.

As a result, 38.9% of patients reported that they would be satisfied with the use of teledentistry applications.

The effects of gender, age, educational level, and income level on the positive views of patients regarding tele­dentistry practices were examined. They are summarized in Table 4.

Accordingly, different income and education levels did not significantly affect the attitude toward teledentistry; however, it was observed that males and those who were relatively older had a more positive perspective.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the perceptions of patients and clinicians in Turkey regarding teledentistry. It provides insight into the level of knowledge, awareness and experience of tele­dentistry among Turkish dentists and patients. This question­naire study included 336 dentists from different regions of the country and 447 patients from one city in Turkey.

Teledentistry is a novel method of health service de­livery that enables dentists to triage patients and conduct follow-up,21 as well as to give advice and reassurance when necessary.22 Consistent with other studies in the literature,22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 our results show positive and promising results for the future of teledentistry, as both patients and dentists alike seem to find merits in this service.

In the present study, 33.2% of the participating female dentists and 30.7% of the male dentists reported that they were aware of teledentistry. There were 86.9% of dentists who stated that they would like to use teledentistry for radiological examinations, some follow-up examinations, and for follow-up during holidays. Among the dentists, 66.1% thought that follow-up with a teledentistry application would not be sufficient, 85.4% thought they would have a problem of trust in the patient information obtained in this way, and 46.4% thought they might experience patient confidentiality violation. There were 21.1% of dentists who thought that teledentistry practices could be the new standard of oral healthcare, and only 34% were willing to try these practices. Among specialists, 41.1% were aware of teledentistry.

In a study by Subhan et al., it was observed that 62.5% of dentists did not know about teledentistry before COVID-19, but most of them (68.6%) now have know­ledge about it.24 Almazrooa et al. reported that 83.0% of dentists were sure that teledentistry could improve daily dental practice.25 Al-Khalifa and AlSheikh reported that more than 70.0% of respondents agreed that teledentistry would improve dental practice by increasing peer communication, mentoring and the referral of new patients.26 There were 80.0% of respondents who were concerned about confidentiality.26 In a study by Abbas et al., 72.4% of dentists reported that they were aware of teledentistry, and 76.0% reported that teledentistry could be really helpful in health education.28 According to the opinion of 35.9% of dentists, teledentistry could be used in every branch of dentistry, and 88.2% of respondents stated that teledentistry could be useful in improving access to oral health services.28 Raucci-Neto et al. reported that 89.5% and 81.4% of general practitioners and specialists, respectively, had no previous experience with teledentistry.29 There were 38.9% of dentists who also had superficial information. Among the dentists, 37.7% believed that there would be difficulties when using teledentistry, and 48.9% thought that teledentistry would not be fully effective.29 In a study by Pradhan et al., 96.1% of postgraduate students were aware of teledentistry.30 There were 58.4% of respondents who thought that teledentistry helped with consulting a specialist about a particular patient’s problem.30

When evaluated in terms of patients, the results of the current study were as follows: 74.5% of patients mentioned that it would be easier to communicate with the dentist via a teledentistry application; 80.3% of patients in underserved regions responded that it would facilitate access to the dentist; 71.4% of patients said that tele­dentistry practices would contribute to regular dental examinations; 79.0% of patients indicated that teledentistry practices could save time; 76.3% of patients stated that it would reduce costs; and 88.8% of patients thought that this method could help overcome the problem of isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic period. However, 51.0% of patients stated that follow-up with teledentistry would not be sufficient, 62.2% of patients indicated that the interviews conducted through a teledentistry application would not be as accurate as face-to-face interviews, and 24.8% of patients marked that they might experience personal information privacy violation. There were 38.9% of patients who reported that they would be satisfied with the use of teledentistry applications.

In a study by Byrne and Watkinson, 76.0% of patients said that remote consultation was more convenient than face-to-face consultation, and 66.0% stated that they would like more such appointments to be made in the future, if appropriate.31 In a study by Menhadji et al., the majority of patients (83.4%) agreed that it was easy to make an appointment online, and 84.9% of patients found it easy to follow appointment instructions.23 The majority of patients (70.7%) strongly agreed that their video consultation was uneventful. Only a small number of patients (2.1%) strongly disagreed about a better understanding of their dental condition. The majority (59.2%) strongly agreed that the dentist told the patient everything they needed to know, and thus answered all questions. Among the patients, 64.0% thought that the consultation was comprehensive.23 Rahman et al. stated that patients using the virtual clinic and telephone consultation were satisfied with their experience at 97% and 94%, respectively.27 All participants agreed with the statement that teledentistry would be very useful in saving time, and a significant proportion (96.0%) would use it again in light of COVID-19.27

Based on the literature review, different results were found among studies. The reason for this situation may be that the studies were carried out in different countries, under different conditions (infrastructure, dental education curriculum, etc.) and with different characteristics of the participants included in the study (the educational status, the income status, etc.).

Based on the results of the present study, the use of the teledentistry approach can enable earlier access to healthcare, provide specialist care, minimize work time, and reduce traveling long distances for consultation.26 For healthcare providers, it has the potential to eliminate inappropriate referrals31 and reduce long waiting lists.32 Thanks to teledentistry applications, which allow remote communication, the risk of infection, specifically cross-infection between patients, healthcare workers and other people, can be reduced.33 However, there are some challenges, limitations and legal issues to be considered with regard to teledentistry, as there are concerns about reimbursement, logistics, licensing regulations, costs, the lack of a physical examination, and data quality and security according to each country’s rules.1, 34, 35 While applying teledentistry, it is necessary to comply with state laws and the principles of practice.34 It is very important to establish a well-equipped technological infrastructure system to ensure adequate service and security regarding the exchange of patient data.35, 36, 37, 38

Limitations

The strengths of this study are a large sample size with different employment institutions, a high response rate, and the recording of opinions for both dentists and patients. However, there are also some limitations associated with the characteristics of survey studies. This study provided information about the teledentistry knowledge and awareness of patients living in Edirne. Thus, our findings cannot be generalized to the whole population of Turkey. This survey shows a positive attitude toward teledentistry as a general concept. Detailed research is needed to target specific aspects, such as the use for patient screening, dia­gnosis, referral, or other implementations.

Conclusions

It is important to conduct future comprehensive studies on teledentistry with a larger number of participants to try to minimize difficulties in practice, strengthen the infrastructure technologically, and increase the knowledge level of dentists by including this subject in dentistry undergraduate and postgraduate education in Turkey.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the medical research ethics committee at the Faculty of Medicine of Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey (TUFT-BAEK 2020/319). Informed written consent was obtained from all the participants.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Tables


Table 1. Questionnaire for dentists

No.

Questions for dentists

1.

Gender

2.

Years of occupation

3.

Employment institution

4.

Professional specialty

5.

Have you heard of teledentistry applications before?

6.

I know the concept of teledentistry.

7.

I think that teledentistry practices can be useful.

8.

In which situations would you prefer to use a teledentistry application?

9.

Teledentistry practices may violate the patient’s privacy.

10.

Talking to the patient in person combined with teledentistry practices can be helpful.

11.

Teledentistry practices could be time-saving.

12.

Teledentistry practices could be profitable.

13.

My follow-up appointments could be better with the use a teledentistry application.

14.

Teledentistry practices could be the standard way of providing oral healthcare.

15.

Teledentistry can make it easier for me to communicate with the patient.

16.

If I were using a teledentistry application, I could not always rely on the accuracy of the patient information entered into the system.

17.

At some point in my professional life, I would like to provide health services with the use of a teledentistry application.

18.

I would like the address information of the institution I work for to be shared with the patient through a teledentistry application.

19.

I would like to share information about the patient’s treatment needs with other physicians or to guide the patient through a teledentistry application.

Table 2. Questionnaire for patients

No.

Questions for patients

1.

Gender

2.

Age

3.

Educational level

4.

Monthly income

5.

How satisfied would you be if there was an online (teledentistry) remote examination for dental patients?

6.

The teledentistry program can make it easier for me to communicate with the dentist.

7.

Using teledentistry, my dentist can do my check-ups well enough.

8.

Teledentistry can contribute to regular dental examinations.

9.

A dental examination with teledentistry is as accurate as during a face-to-face meeting.

10.

Teledentistry can reduce the cost of dental services.

11.

Teledentistry can be a time saver for me.

12.

Teledentistry can improve access to specialists in rural and underserved communities.

13.

Considering the COVID-19 pandemic, teledentistry, which reduces contact with the patient, can help overcome the problem of isolation.

14.

Can teledentistry violate your privacy?

COVID-19 – coronavirus disease 2019.
Table 3. Distribution of the dentists included in the study by gender, years of occupation and employment institution, and the effects of these factors on the awareness of teledentistry

Factors

Percentage
of all dentists
[%]

I am aware of teledentistry
[%]

p-value

Gender

male

30.1

30.7

0.654

female

69.9

33.2

Years of occupation

1–5

39.6

20.3

0.002*

6–10

19.9

43.3

11–15

10.4

45.7

16–20

6.8

43.5

>20

23.3

34.6

Employment institution

university

31.3

42.9

0.010*

PHDODHC

10.1

41.2

polyclinic

29.8

22.0

private clinic

27.1

27.5

other

1.7

50.0

Specialty

yes

48.5

41.1

0.001*

no

51.5

24.3

PHDODHC – Provincial Health Directorate Oral and Dental Health Center;
* statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Distribution of the patients included in the study by gender, age, educational level, and income level, and the effects of these factors on a positive attitude toward teledentistry practices

Factors

Percentage
of all
patients

[%]

I would be satisfied with the use of teledentistry by dentists
[%]

p-value

Gender

male

50.1

43.8

0.036*

female

49.9

34.1

Age
[years]

20–44

79.0

38.0

0.019*

45–54

14.5

32.3

55–64

4.5

65.0

>64

2.0

66.7

Educational level

uneducated

1.8

37.5

0.126

primary school

24.2

47.2

high school

33.6

34.0

university

32.9

35.4

PhD/master’s degree

7.5

50.0

Income level

low

19.5

40.2

0.001*

middle

54.4

39.9

high

26.1

38.9

Figures


Fig. 1. Distribution of the dentists according to their specialties
Fig. 2. Educational status of the patients

References (38)

  1. Daniel SJ, Kumar S. Teledentistry: A key component in access to care. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2014;14(Suppl):201–208. doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.02.008
  2. Hilty DM, Ferrer DC, Parish MB, Johnston B, Callahan EJ, Yellowlees PM. The effectiveness of telemental health: A 2013 review. Telemed J E Health. 2013;19(6):444–454. doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0075
  3. AlShaya MS, Assery MK, Pani SC. Reliability of mobile phone teledentistry in dental diagnosis and treatment planning in mixed dentition. J Telemed Telecare. 2020;26(1–2):45–52. doi:10.1177/1357633X18793767
  4. Sanjeev M, Shushant G. Teledentistry a new trend in oral health. Int J Clin Cases Investig. 2011;2(6):49–53.
  5. Khan SA, Omar H. Teledentistry in practice: Literature review. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19(7):565–567. doi:10.1089/tmj.2012.0200
  6. Soltanmohamadi Borujeni E, Sarshar F, Nasiri M, Sarshar S, Jazi L. Effect of teledentistry on the oral health status of patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment at the first three follow-up visits. Dent Med Probl. 2021;58(3):299–304. doi:10.17219/dmp/134750
  7. Graschew G, Roelofs TA, eds. Advances in Telemedicine: Applications in Various Medical Disciplines and Geographical Regions. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2011. doi:10.5772/1863
  8. Alabdullah JH, Daniel SJ. A systematic review on the validity of teledentistry. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(8):639–648. doi:10.1089/tmj.2017.0132
  9. Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT, Billings RJ. Teledentistry in inner-city child-care centres. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(4):176–181. doi:10.1258/135763306777488744
  10. Mariño R, Ghanim A. Teledentistry: A systematic review of the literature. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19(4):179–183. doi:10.1177/1357633x13479704
  11. Gopal Reddy KV. Using teledentistry for providing the specialist access to rural Indians. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(2):189. doi:10.4103/0970-9290.84275
  12. Irving M, Stewart R, Spallek H, Blinkhorn A. Using teledentistry in clinical practice as an enabler to improve access to clinical care: A qualitative systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(3):129–146. doi:10.1177/1357633X16686776
  13. Estai M, Bunt S, Kanagasingam Y, Kruger E, Tennant M. Diagnostic accuracy of teledentistry in the detection of dental caries: A systematic review. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2016;16(3):161–172. doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2016.08.003
  14. Jacobs MJ, Edmondson MJ, Lowry JC. Accuracy of diagnosis of fractures by maxillofacial and accident and emergency doctors using plain radiography compared with a telemedicine system: A prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;40(2):156–162. doi:10.1054/bjom.2001.0751
  15. Queyroux A, Saricassapian B, Herzog D, et al. Accuracy of teledentistry for diagnosing dental pathology using direct examination as a gold standard: Results of the Tel-e-dent Study of older adults living in nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(6):528–532. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.082
  16. McLaren SW, Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT, Nordfelt J. Accuracy of teledentistry examinations at predicting actual treatment modality in a pediatric dentistry clinic. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(8):710–715. doi:10.1177/1357633X16661428
  17. Steinmeier S, Wiedemeier D, Hämmerle CH, Mühlemann S. Accuracy of remote diagnoses using intraoral scans captured in approximate true color: A pilot and validation study in teledentistry. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):266. doi:10.1186/s12903-020-01255-8
  18. Chang SW, Plotkin DR, Mulligan R, Polido JC, Mah JK, Meara JG. Teledentistry in rural California: A USC initiative. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2003;31(8):601–608. PMID:13677402.
  19. Bhambal A, Saxena S, Balsaraf SV. Teledentistry: Potentials unexplored! J Int Oral Health. 2010;2(3):1–6. https://www.ispcd.org/userfiles/rishabh/jioh-02-03-01.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2022.
  20. Bhargava A, Sabbarwal B, Jaggi A, Chand S, Tandon S. Teledentistry: A literature review of evolution and ethicolegal aspects. J Global Oral Health. 2019;2(2):128–133. doi:10.25259/JGOH_68_2019
  21. AlKlayb SA, Assery MK, AlQahtani A, AlAnazi M, Pani SC. Comparison of the effectiveness of a mobile phone-based education program in educating mothers as oral health providers in two regions of Saudi Arabia. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017;7(3):110–115. doi:10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_95_17
  22. Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, et al. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(6):957–962. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa067
  23. Menhadji P, Patel R, Asimakopoulou K, et al. Patients’ and dentists’ perceptions of tele-dentistry at the time of COVID-19. A questionnaire-based study. J Dent. 2021;113:103782. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103782
  24. Subhan R, Ismail WA, Musharraf S, Khan M, Hafeez R, Alam MK. Teledentistry as a supportive tool for dentists in Pakistan. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:8757859. doi:10.1155/2021/8757859
  25. Almazrooa SA, Mansour GA, Alhamed SA, et al. The application of teledentistry for Saudi patients’ care: A national survey study. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(1):280–286. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2020.04.014
  26. Al-Khalifa KS, AlSheikh R. Teledentistry awareness among dental professionals in Saudi Arabia. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240825. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240825
  27. Rahman N, Nathwani S, Kandiah T. Teledentistry from a patient perspective during the coronavirus pandemic. Br Dent J. 2020:1–4. doi:10.1038/s41415-020-1919-6
  28. Abbas B, Wajahat M, Saleem Z, Imran E, Sajjad M, Khurshid Z. Role of teledentistry in COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide comparative analysis among dental professionals. Eur J Dent. 2020;14(S 01):S116–S122. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1722107
  29. Raucci-Neto W, De Souza Pereira M, Cerqueira NM, Louzada VG, De Castro Raucci LM, Leoni GB. Knowledge, perception, and experience of dentists about teledentistry. Int Dent J. 2022;72(4):456–462. doi:10.1016/j.identj.2021.07.007
  30. Pradhan D, Verma P, Sharma L, Khaitan T. Knowledge, awareness, and attitude regarding teledentistry among postgraduate dental students of Kanpur city, India: A questionnaire study. J Edu Health Promot. 2019;8:104. doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_363_18
  31. Byrne E, Watkinson S. Patient and clinician satisfaction with video consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic: An opportunity for a new way of working. J Orthod. 2021;48(1):64–73. doi:10.1177/1465312520973677
  32. Mandall NA, O’Brien KD, Brady J, Worthington HV, Harvey L. Teledentistry for screening new patient orthodontic referrals. Part 1: A randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J. 2005;199(10):659–662. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4812930
  33. Mariño R, Clarke K, Manton DJ, et al. Teleconsultation and telediagnosis for oral health assessment: An Australian perspective. In: Kumar S, ed. Teledentistry. Health Informatics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2015:101–112. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08973-7_10
  34. Machado RA, De Souza NL, Oliveira RM, Martelli H Jr., Ferreti Bonan PR. Social media and telemedicine for oral diagnosis and counselling in the COVID-19 era. Oral Oncol. 2020;105:104685. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104685
  35. Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT, McLaren SW, Billings RJ. Advancement of teledentistry at the University of Rochester’s Eastman Institute for Oral Health. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(12):1960–1966. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05102
  36. Avula H. Tele-periodontics – oral health care at a grass root level. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015;19(5):589–592. doi:10.4103/0972-124X.157875
  37. Berndt J, Leone P, King G. Using teledentistry to provide interceptive orthodontic services to disadvantaged children. AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(5):700–706. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.023
  38. Chen H, Fricton J. Teledentistry: Seeing the doctor from a distance. Northwest Dent. 2007;86(2):27–28. PMID:17479702.