Dental and Medical Problems

Dent Med Probl
JCR Impact Factor (IF) – 2.6
Scopus CiteScore (2022) – 2.9
Index Copernicus (ICV 2021) – 132.50
MEiN – 200 pts
Average rejection rate (2022) – 79.69%
ISSN 1644-387X (print)
ISSN 2300-9020 (online)
Periodicity – quarterly


Download original text (EN)

Dental and Medical Problems

Ahead of print

doi: 10.17219/dmp/161681

Publication type: original article

Language: English

License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Cite as:

Havale R, Prakasha SS, George SE, et al. Stevia vs. triple antibiotic paste: An intracanal battle? [published online as ahead of print on July 20, 2023]. Dent Med Probl. doi:10.17219/dmp/161681

Stevia vs. triple antibiotic paste: An intracanal battle?

Raghavendra Havale1,A, Shrutha Santhebachalli Prakasha1,A, Sharon Elizebeth George1,B,D, Namratha Tharay1,C, Shiny Raj1,C, Chandrabanda Bhavana1,E, Afreen Anjum Syed1,D, Anand Kumar2,E, Venkatesh Naik3,F

1 Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, AME’s Dental College and Hospital, Raichur, India

2 Department of Pharmaceutics, V.L. College of Pharmacy, Raichur, India

3 Department of Microbiology, Raichur Institute of Medical Sciences, India

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstracts


Background. Intracanal medicaments are vital in treating the infections of the deciduous dentition due to the large percentage of accessory canals that hasten the microbial spread to the periradicular region. Though countless medicaments have been produced to reduce the microbial load and aid symptomatic relief, they still do not fulfill every function of an ideal medicament.

Objectives. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of Stevia rebaudiana (S. rebaudiana) and triple antibiotic paste (TAP) against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis).

Material and methods. The present in vitro, parallel, double-blinded study had an equal allocation ratio. The specimens were prepared, randomly divided into 4 groups and inoculated with E. faecalis (ATCC35550). Following incubation, the first 3 groups were treated with S. rebaudiana, triple antibiotic therapy or carbopol gel, respectively, with the 4th negative control group left untreated. The microbial samples were collected before and after treatment, and the counts of colony-forming units (CFUs) were compared. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis, Dunn’s post-hoc and Wilcoxon’s signed rank tests.

Results. The first 2 groups displayed a significant decrease in CFUs after drug application, while the carbopol and control groups showed an exponential increase. There was no statistically significant difference between the stevia and TAP groups (p = 0.630).

Conclusions. Stevia gel was comparable to TAP in terms of antimicrobial efficacy, and can therefore be considered a new alternative in intracanal treatment.

Keywords: triple antibiotic paste, intracanal medicament, stevia


The most important etiologic factors for pulp and periradicular diseases are pathogens, of which Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is of paramount importance. It is a facultative gram-positive anaerobe, occurring abun­dantly in failed endodontic canals.1 Classical biomechani­cal preparations can help eliminate microorganisms while extirpating the infected tissue. However, tortuous roots and the complexity of accessory canals, as well as the abi­lity of E. faecalis to exist independently as a biofilm without synergistic support, make it difficult to eliminate the possibility of reinfection after obturation. Therefore, better eradication of such microorganisms requires an additi­onal disinfection approach with the use of irrigants and intracanal medications.

Intracanal medications aim to reduce bacterial colonies and prevent reinfection. Various drugs used to disinfect the canal include calcium hydroxide, Formocresol®, triple antibiotic paste (TAP), chlorhexidine digluconate, and Ledermix, of which calcium hydroxide and TAP are most commonly used. Although their efficacy has been demonstrated in many studies, both have several disadvantages. Calcium hydroxide is less effective against E. faecalis and completely ineffective against yeast-like fungi,2 which are the primary commensals of the infected ducts. In addition, allergic tissue reactions have been reported in numerous cases. Triple antibiotic paste (minocycline, ciprofloxacin, metronidazole), on the other hand, has been very successful in eliminating endodontic pathogens.3 However, its use has resulted in coronal discoloration4 and a reduction in dentin hardness.5 Due to these drawbacks, there is a constant search for better novel materials.

Stevia rebaudiana (S. rebaudiana), also called candy leaf, is a flowering plant native to Paraguay that is cultivated for its sweet-tasting leaves. It is used by diabetics in a dried form as a calorie-free natural sweetener, and is rich in terpenes and flavonoids, which have good anti­bacterial and antifungal properties.6 In dentistry, stevia was shown to inhibit plaque and gingivitis when used as a mouthwash in an in vivo study.7 Stevia has been shown to be non-toxic,8 and have therapeutic effects in treating cancer,9 inflammation,10 cysts,11 and obesity.12 Also, it can be safely consumed during pregnancy without a fear of teratogenicity.8 Considering these benefits, the present study evaluated and compared the antimicrobial proper­ties of stevia and TAP against E. faecalis when used as intracanal drugs.

Material and methods

Study design

The present study followed an in vitro design, and was planned and performed according to the Checklist for Reporting In-vitro Studies (CRIS) and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines.

Since the present study was conducted in vitro, it was exempted from the review by the institutional ethics committee.

Study setting

The study was conducted at the Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry of AME’s Dental College and Hospital, Raichur, India, in collaboration with the Department of Pharmaceutics of the V.L. College of Pharmacy, Raichur, India, and the Department of Microbiology of Raichur Institute of Medical Sciences.

Sample size

The sample size was estimated using the G*Power software, v. ( Considering a power (1-β) of 80% and an α-error of 5%, the total sample size was set at 40 (10 × 4 groups = 40 samples).

Preparation of the teeth

The examined samples included freshly extracted pre­molars with intact crowns and fully formed root apices.13 Teeth that were fractured, carious, previously restored, calcified, or with multiple canals or resorbed roots were excluded.14

The root length of the specimens was standardized by decoronating the teeth with a 0.1-millimeter-thick double-sided diamond disk (Dentorium Products, Farmingdale, USA). The roots were prepared to a working length of 14 mm, using K files with an apical file size 35–70 (Mani Medical India, New Delhi, India), with an increment of 1 mm to ensure the standardization of measurements. All canals were rinsed with 1 mL of 2% NaOCl (Vishal Dentocare, Ahmedabad, India) for 30 s between the instrumentation stages. A 3-milliliter preparation of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Dental Avenue India, Palghar, India) was administered and the canals were soaked for 5 min, followed by final irrigation with 5 mL of sterile saline. The apical foramen was sealed with light-cured composite resin and the outer surface of the root was made impermeable by coating it with 2 layers of epoxy resin (Fortune Chemie, Bangalore, India).15 All specimens were autoclaved under standard conditions (121°C for 15 min) and stored in an ultraviolet (UV) chamber to ensure sterility.

Preparation of the drugs

Stevia extraction and formulations

A total of 40 g of dried powdered stevia (Stevia World Agrotech, Bangalore, India) was added to 200 mL of absolute alcohol and boiled in a Soxhlet apparatus for 23 cycles.16 The obtained extract was then reduced to 20 mL and formulated at different concentrations (0.1%, 0.2%, 0.6%, 0.7%, and 0.8%) to determine the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) (Table 1). The experimental formulations were based on random concentrations, and if positive for microbial inhibition, new formulations with adjacent lower concentrations were used. The MBC of stevia was determined using the spot inoculation technique,17 in which 1 mL of activated E. faecalis suspension was combined with equal parts of different drug concentrations and dropped onto a blood agar plate divided into 5 compartments. The contaminated plate was then incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 24 h, and changes were noted. The minimum drug concentration at which the complete elimination of the organism occurred was 0.7%. The concentrations for different formulations were chosen randomly, and since 0.6% did not show any inhibition, there was no need for formulations at 0.3%, 0.4% or 0.5% concentrations.

Stevia gel preparation

Carbopol powder (50 mg) was added to 10 mL of distilled water and sonicated for 5 cycles, each lasting 2 min. After achieving a homogeneous solution, 0.7 mL of stevia from a freshly prepared extract was added. Triethanolamine (Qualigens Fine Chemicals, Mumbai, India) was then added dropwise and stirred until a gel-like consistency was obtained. Carbopol served as a thickening agent, while triethanolamine acted as a neutralizing agent.

Triple antibiotic gel preparation

Triple antibiotic gel (TAG) was formulated using Hashimoto’s ratio, combining equal parts of minocycline (100 mg), ciprofloxacin (200 mg) and metronidazole (500 mg) (Lifecare Neuro Products, Baddi, India) with 50 mg of Carbopol®-934 (Rolex Pharmaceuticals Limited, Ahmedabad, India) and 10 mL of distilled water. Sonication was performed for 5 cycles. Triethanolamine (Qualigens Fine Chemicals) was then added dropwise and stirred until a gel-like consistency was reached.


The samples were fixed in sterile Eppendorf tubes and stabilized on 5-milliliter tubes. A standard strain of E. faecalis was reactivated in brain–heart infusion (BHI) broth, and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 24 h. After microbial growth, a suspension of the culture was prepared in a tube containing 10 mL of saline (0.9%) at a concentration of 2 on the McFarland scale, with 5 mL of the prepared suspension mixed with 5 mL of BHI broth in a test tube to obtain the final suspension. Then, 20 µL of the final suspension was introduced into the root canal with the use of a 0.3-milliliter insulin syringe, and a cotton pellet dipped in the suspension was inserted into the canal opening. Incubation continued for 21 days in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. The viability and purity of the microorganisms were assessed weekly by Gram staining.15

Microbiological examination

After 21 days, the microbial samples were collected by inserting absorbent paper cones into the canal for 1 min, which were then transferred to Eppendorf tubes containing 1 mL of saline and shaken in a tube shaker for 30 s. Serial dilutions of each suspension were prepared to a concentration of 10–5 mg/mL, and 0.1 mL of the suspension from each sample was seeded and streaked onto blood agar plates, and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 24 h. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were then mechanically counted and the number of viable germs was calculated.14 Saline irrigation was performed 3 times to remove the free-flowing detached bacteria, and the intracanal medication was then administered: 0.7% stevia gel (group 1); TAP (group 2); or carbopol gel (vehicle) (group 3). Group 4 (control) was left untreated.

Analysis of the root canal samples

After an incubation period of 7 days, the drug was flushed out by rinsing with saline. Absorbent paper cones were inserted and the procedure was repeated.4 The count of CFUs was noted and compared (Figure 1).

Statistical analysis

The quantitative data post triplicate experimentation was subjected to statistical analysis and tabulated. The intergroup analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, whereas intragroup comparisons used the Wilcoxon test, with a p-value set at 0.05. Pairwise comparisons with Dunn’s post-hoc test determined the significant intergroup differences.


Minimal bactericidal concentration

The MBC of stevia that totally inhibited the growth of E. faecalis was 0.7%.

Intergroup analysis


The mean count of CFUs of E. faecalis before treatment was 407.60 ±177.37 in the stevia group, 443.50 ±130.04 in the TAP group, 393.90 ±88.34 in the vehicle group, and 444.30 ±52.70 in the control group, with no significant differences between the 4 groups (p = 0.420) (Table 2, Figure 2).


The mean count of E. faecalis CFUs after treatment was 2.30 ±0.82 in the stevia group, 1.90 ±0.74 in the TAP group, 391.80 ±87.97 in the vehicle group, and 444.30 ±52.37 in the control group. There were significant differences in the E. faecalis CFUs between the 4 groups post-intervention (p < 0.001) (Table 2, Figure 2).

Pairwise analysis

Multiple pairwise comparisons revealed that in groups 1 and 2, the mean count of CFUs was significantly smaller as compared to groups 4 and 5 (p ≤ 0.001).
However, no remarkable differences were observed between groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.630), and groups 3 and 4 (p = 0.400) (Table 3).


This study focused on the formulation of a drug that overcomes the disadvantages of commercially available preparations, but also leads the way in terms of anti­microbial properties. Stevia was the preferred alternative, as it has been shown historically to be superior to industrially marketed chlorhexidine mouthwashes in limiting plaque, gingivitis,16 and the count of caries-forming organisms.18 The steviol glycoside that the preparation contains also makes it palatable to children because of its sweet taste. The other group in this trial received TAP (in the present study, it was in fact TAG to distinguish the vehicle used), which causes coronal discoloration despite its good canal-disinfecting properties.19 Also, the mino­cycline component in TAP has been associated with allergic reactions in many cases.20 The available literature suggests that a biocompatible herbal drug with minimal/no side effects is preferable.

The overall performance of intracanal drugs depends on the type of carrier used. Gels are generally much less viscous than pastes, which improves penetration deep into the canal and collateral canals. In addition, pastes adversely affect the microhardness of dentin.5 A study investigating the properties of different carrier mate­rials demonstrated that macrogol and propylene glycol, the traditional carrier materials for TAP, had some antimicro­bial effects, leading to some bias.21 Considering all of the above factors, a carbopol gel-based vehicle was selected as the delivery system, as it has a neutral pH and is efficient in terms of permeability.22

Enterococcus faecalis naturally produces reactive oxygen species (ROS), and to combat them, antioxidants are produced simultaneously. This property makes the bacteria tolerant to acidic environments; nevertheless, TAP with its acidic pH (5.5) successfully limits the E. faecalis count, suggesting that both acidic and alkaline niches can affect the growth of E. faecalis.23

The results of the present study indicate that stevia acts very similarly to TAP; its antibacterial properties could result from oxygen radicals (hydroxyl, nitrate and peroxide) causing DNA mutations, base pair modification and intercellular protein cross-linking.17 Carbopol is acidic in nature, with a pH of 2–2.5, but the pH rises to neutral by adding triethanolamine, which is both a gelling agent and a neutralizer.

Stevia is a novel product with very limited reports in the literature, and this study was conducted to explore the possibility of using stevia as a bactericidal/bacteriostatic agent. The exploratory nature of the study made it justifiable to use a relatively small sample size.


Stevia demonstrated a significant reduction in the count of E. faecalis, similar to TAP, when used as an intracanal medicament.

This study concluded that carbopol did not influence the antimicrobial efficacy of the experimental drug used as an intracanal medicament, which was comparable to that of the traditionally used TAP.

However, it should be noted that the oral cavity and the root canal system are inhabited by a variety of microflora, and the lack of substantial data on the antimicrobial efficacy of stevia against this microbiota suggests the need for further studies.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.


Table 1. Different concentrations of the stevia extract formulated for checking the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC)





0.1 mL of the extract brought up
to 10 mL by the addition of ethanol
yields 1.007 mg/mL



0.2 mL of the extract brought up
to 10 mL by the addition of ethanol
yields 2.014 mg/mL



0.6 mL of the extract brought up
to 10 mL by the addition of ethanol
yields 6.042 mg/mL



0.7 mL of the extract brought up
to 10 mL by the addition of ethanol
yields 7.049 mg/mL



0.8 mL of the extract brought up
to 10 mL by the addition of ethanol
yields 8.056 mg/mL


Table 2. Comparison of the mean count of colony-forming units (CFUs) of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) (×108) between the 4 groups
pre- and post-treatment (
Kruskal–Wallis test)


CFUs of E. faecalis (×108)






407.60 ±177.37


2.30 ±0.82



443.50 ±130.04

1.90 ±0.74


393.90 ±88.34

391.80 ±87.97


444.30 ±52.70

444.30 ±52.37

Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (M ±SD).
* statistically significant.
Table 3. Multiple pairwise comparisons of the mean differences in the count of colony-forming units (CFUs) of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) (×108) between the 4 groups post-treatment (Dunn’s post-hoc test)

Group (A)

Group (B)

(A – B)

95% CI for MD





































MD – mean difference; CI – confidence interval; * statistically significant.


Fig. 1. Microbial colonies formed pre- and post-treatment with different drugs
A – stevia; B – triple antibiotic paste (TAP); C – carbopol; D – control group (untreated).
Fig. 2. Mean count of colony-forming units (CFUs) of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) before and after drug application

References (23)

  1. Aydın H, Er K, Kuştarcı A, et al. Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles activated by photodynamic therapy in infected root canals. Dent Med Probl. 2020;57(4):393–400. doi:10.17219/dmp/123615
  2. Kim D, Kim E. Antimicrobial effect of calcium hydroxide as an intracanal medicament in root canal treatment: A literature review – Part I. In vitro studies. Restor Dent Endod. 2014;39(4):241–252. doi:10.5395/rde.2014.39.4.241
  3. Shaik J, Garlapati R, Nagesh B, Sujana V, Jayaprakash T, Naidu S. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of triple antibiotic paste and calcium hydroxide using chitosan as carrier against Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(4):335–339. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.136444
  4. Venkataraman M, Singhal S, Tikku AP, Chandra A. Comparative analysis of tooth discoloration induced by conventional and modified triple antibiotic pastes used in regenerative endodontics. Indian J Dent Res. 2019;30(6):933–936. doi:10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_782_18
  5. Parashar V, Khan SA, Singh P, Sharma S, Kumar A, Kumar A. Effect of intracanal medicaments (modified triple antibiotic paste, calcium hydroxide, and aloe vera) on microhardness of root dentine: An in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020;21(6):632–635. PMID:33025931.
  6. Muradashvili M, Jabnidze N, Koiava L, et al. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of Stevia rebaudiana leaf extract in vitro condition. Biol Forum. 2019;11(1):212–216. Accessed February 12, 2022.
  7. Vandana K, Reddy VC, Sudhir KM, Kumar K, Raju SH, Babu JN. Effectiveness of stevia as a mouthrinse among 12–15-year-old schoolchildren in Nellore district, Andhra Pradesh – a randomized controlled trial. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017;21(1):37–43. doi:10.4103/jisp.jisp_54_17
  8. Momtazi-Borojeni AA, Esmaeili SA, Abdollahi E, Sahebkar A. A review on the pharmacology and toxicology of steviol glycosides extracted from Stevia rebaudiana. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(11):1616–1622. doi:10.2174/1381612822666161021142835
  9. Konoshima T, Takasaki M. Cancer-chemopreventive effect of natural sweeteners and related compounds. Pure Appl Chem. 2002;74(7):1309–1316. doi:10.1351/pac200274071309
  10. Fengyang L, Yunhe F, Bo L, et al. Stevioside suppressed inflammatory cytokine secretion by downregulation of NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. Inflammation. 2012;35(5):1669–1675. doi:10.1007/s10753-012-9483-0
  11. Yuajit C, Homvisasevongsa S, Chatsudthipong L, Soodvilai S, Muanprasat C, Chatsudthipong V. Steviol reduces MDCK cyst formation and growth by inhibiting CFTR channel activity and promoting proteasome-mediated CFTR degradation. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58871. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058871
  12. Abo Elnaga NI, Massoud MI, Yousef MI, Mohamed HH. Effect of stevia sweetener consumption as non-caloric sweetening on body weight gain and biochemical’s parameters in overweight female rats. Ann Agric Sci. 2016;61(1):155–163. doi:10.1016/j.aoas.2015.11.008
  13. Pandey S, Shekhar R, Paul R, et al. A comparative evaluation and effectiveness of different antimicrobial herbal extracts as endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. University J Dent Scie. 2018;4(2):75–81. Accessed February 12, 2022.
  14. Kharouf N, Pedullà E, La Rosa GR, et al. In vitro evaluation of different irrigation protocols on intracanal smear layer removal in teeth with or without pre-endodontic proximal wall restoration. J Clin Med. 2020;9(10):3325. doi:10.3390/jcm9103325
  15. Hartmann RC, Neuvald L, Barth V Jr., et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of 0.5% peracetic acid and EDTA with passive ultrasonic or manual agitation in an Enterococcus faecalis biofilm model. Aust Endod J. 2019;45(1):57–63. doi:10.1111/aej.12279
  16. Koseki S, Yoshida K, Kamitani Y, Itoh K. Influence of inoculation method, spot inoculation site, and inoculation size on the efficacy of acidic electrolyzed water against pathogens on lettuce. J Food Prot. 2003;66(11):2010–2016. doi:10.4315/0362-028x-66.11.2010
  17. Ghosh S, Subudhi E, Nayak S. Antimicrobial assay of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni leaf extracts against 10 pathogens. Int J Integr Biol. 2008;2(1):27–31.
  18. Usha C, Ramarao S, John BM, Babu ME. Anticariogenicity of Stevia rebaudiana extract when used as a mouthwash in high caries risk patients: Randomized controlled clinical trial. World J Dent. 2017;8(5):364–369. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1466
  19. Thomas MS. Crown discoloration due to the use of triple antibiotic paste as an endodontic intra-canal medicament. Saudi Endod J. 2014;4(1):32–35. doi:10.4103/1658-5984.127985
  20. Mohammadi Z, Jafarzadeh H, Shalavi S, Yaripour S, Sharifi F, Kinoshita JI. A review on triple antibiotic paste as a suitable material used in regenerative endodontics. Iran Endod J. 2018;13(1):1–6. doi:10.22037/iej.v13i1.17941
  21. Mandal SS, Margasahayam SV, Shenoy VU. A comparative evaluation of the influence of three different vehicles on the antimicrobial efficacy of triple antibiotic paste against Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2020;11(2):150–157. doi:10.4103/ccd.ccd_372_19
  22. Lubrizol. Neutralizing Carbopol® and Pemulen™ polymers in aqueous and hydroalcoholic systems. 2009. Accessed February 12, 2022.
  23. Szemes T, Vlkova B, Minarik G, et al. On the origin of reactive oxygen species and antioxidative mechanisms in Enterococcus faecalis. Redox Rep. 2010;15(5):202–206. doi:10.1179/135100010X12826446921581